33- References

Alessi, S.M. & Trollip, S.R. (1985), Computer-based instruction- Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Allen, B.S. & Merrill, M.D. (1985). System assigned strategies and CBI. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1 (1),3-21.

Andrews, G.R. & Debus, R.L. (1979). Persistence and the causal perception of failure: modifying cognitive attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology 70(2), 154-66.

Armstrong, A.-M. (1989). The development of self-regulation skills through the modeling and structuring of computer programming. Educational Technology Research and Development 37(2), 69-76.

Arnone, M.P. & Grabowski, B.L. (1992). Effects on children's achievement and curiosity of variations in learner control over an interactive video lesson. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(l), 15-27.

Atkinson, J.W. (1974a). The mainsprings of achievement-orient-ed activity. In JX Atkinson & J.O. Raynor, eds. Motivation and achievement, 13-41. Washington, DC: Winston.

— (1974b). Strength of motivation and efficiency of performance. In JX Atkinson & J.O. Raynor, eds. Motivation and achievement, 193-218. Washington, DC: Winston.

— (1972). Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (1),124-29.

Avner, A., Moore, C. & Smith, S. (1980). Active external control: a basis for superiority of CBI. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 6(4), 115-18.

Balson, P.M., Manning, D.T., Ebner, D.G. & Brooks, F.R. (1984/1985). Instructor-controlled versus student-controlled training in a videodisc-based paramedical program. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 13(2), 123-30.

Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4, 359-73.

Barker, G.P. & Graham, S. (1987). Developmental study of praise and blame as attributional cues. Journal of Educational Psychology 79(l), 62-66.

Borkowski, J.G., Weyhing, R.S. & Carr, M. (1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning-disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology 80(l), 46-53.

Beard, M.H., Lorton, P.V., Searle, B.W. & Atkinson, R.C. (1973). Comparison of student performance and attitude under three lesson-selection strategies in computer-assisted instruction. Stanford University: California Institute of Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 088 466.)

Belland, J.C., Taylor, W.D., Canelos, J., Dwyer, F. & Baker, P. (1985). Is the self-paced instructional program, via microcomputer-based instruction, the most effective method of addressing individual differences? Educational Communications and Technology Journal 33(3), 185-98.

Billings, K. (1982). Computer-assisted learning: a learner-driven model. In The computer. Extension of the human mind Proceedings of the 3rd annual summer conference, University of Oregon. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 219 863.)

Bowers, D. & Tsai, C. (1990). HyperCard in educational research: an introduction and case study. Educational Technology 30(2), 19-24.

Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist 18(3), 200--15.

Bunderson, CX (1974). The design and production of learner-controlled courseware for the TICCIT system: a progress report. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 6 (4),479-91.

Campanizzi, LA. (1978). Effects of locus of control and provision of overviews in a computer-assisted instruction sequence. Association for Educational Data Systems (AEDS) Journal 12(l), 21-30.

Carrier, C.A. (1984). Do learners make good choices? A review of research on learner control in instruction. Instructional Innovator 29(2), 15-17.

Carrier, C.A., Davidson, G., Higson, V. & Williams, M. (1984). Selection of options by field independent and dependent children in a computer-based concept lesson. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 11 (2), 49-54.

Carrier, C.A., Davidson, G. & Williams, M. (1985). Selection of instructional options in a computer-based coordinate concept lesson. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 33(3), 199-212.

Carrier, C.A., Davidson, GX, Williams, M.D. & Kalweit, C.M. (1986). Instructional options and encouragement effects in a microcomputer-delivered concept lesson. Journal of Educational Research 79(4), 222-29.

Carrier, C.A. & Jonassen, D.H. (1988). Adapting courseware to accommodate individual differences. In D.H. Jonassen, ed. Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware, 203-26. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Carrier, C.A. & Williams, M.D. (1988). A test of one learner control strategy with students of differing levels of task persistence. American Educational Research Journal 25(2), 285-306.

Chung, J. & Reigeluth, C.M. (1992). Instructional prescriptions for learner control. Educational Technology 32(10), 14-20.

Clark, R.E. (1982). Antagonism between achievement and enjoyment in ATI studies. Educational Psychologist 17 (2), 92-101.

— (1984). Research on student thought processes during computer-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 7(3), 2-5.

Covington, MX & Omelich, C.L. (1984a). An empirical examination of Weiner's critique of attribution research. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(6), 1214-25.

— & — (1984b). Controversies or consistencies? A reply to Brown and Weiner. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(l),159-68.

— (1985). Ability and effort valuation among failure-avoiding and failure-accepting students. Journal of Educational Psychology 77(4),446-59.

Cronbach, L.J. & Snow, R.E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: a handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.

Dalton, D.W. (1990). The effects of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during interactive video. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 17(l), 8-16.

Dewey,. J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.

Duchastel, P. (1986a). Computer text access. Computer Education 10 (4), 403-09.

Duchastel, P. (1986b). Intelligent computer assisted instruction systems: the nature of learner control. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2(3), 379-93.

Dweck, C.S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31 (4), 674-85.

— (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist 41 (10), 1040-48.

— & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 95 (2), 256-73.

Ellermann, H.H. & Free, E.L. (1990). A subject-controlled environment for paired associate learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 17(3), 97-102.

Faust, G.W. (1974). Design strategy and the TICCIT system. Viewpoints 50(4),91-101.

Federico, P.-A. (1980). Adaptive instruction: trends and issues. In R.E. Snow, P-A. Federico & W.E. Montague, eds. Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 1. cognitive process analyses of aptitude, 1-26. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fine, S.R. (1972). Learner control commands for computer-assisted instruction systems (Tech. Rep. No. 15)..Washington, DC, National Science Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 072 633.)

Fischer, P.M. & Mandl, H. (1988). Knowledge acquisition by computerized audiovisual feedback. European Journal of Psychology of Education 3(2), 217-33.

Fisher, M.D., Blackwell, L.R., Garcia, A.B. & Greene, J.C. (1975). Effects of student control and choice on engagement in a CAI arithmetic task in a low-income school. Journal of Educational Psychology 67(6), 776-83.

Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist 34(10), 906-11.

Fowler, J.W. & Peterson, P.L. (1981). Increasing reading persistence and altering attribution style of learned helpless children. Journal of Educational Psychology 73(2), 251-60.

Fredericks, P.S. (1976, Apr.). The effects of locus of control on CAI performance. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 125 545.)

Gagne, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction, 4th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

— , Briggs, L.J.& Wager, W.W. (1988). Principles of instructional design, 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Garhart, C. & Hannafin, M. (1986). The accuracy of cognitive monitoring during computer-based instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 13(3), 88-93.

Garner, R. &Alexander, P.A. (1989). Metacognition: answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist 24 .(2),143-58.

Gay, G. (1986). Interaction of learner control -and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 78(3), 225-27.

Gehlbach, R.D. (1979). Individual differences: implications for instructional theory, research, and innovation. Educational Researcher 8(4), 8-14.

Goetzfried, L. & Hannafin, M.J. (1985). The effect of locus of CAI control strategies on the learning of mathematics rules. American Educational Research Journal 22(2), 273-78.

Graham, S. & Barker, G.P. (1990). The down side of help: an attributional-developmental analysis of helping behavior as a low-ability cue. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(l),7-14.

Gray, S.H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 14(2),54-56.

— (1989). The effect of locus of control and sequence control on computerized information retrieval and retention. Journal of Educational Computing Research 5(4), 459-71.

Grubb, R.E. (1968). Learner-controlled statistics. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 5(l), 38-42,

Hannafin, M.J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 7(3), 6-10.

— & Colamaio, M.E. (1987). The effects of variations in lesson control and practice on learning from interactive video. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 35(4),203-12.

Hansen, D.W. (1982/1983). User-controlled technology in the humanities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 11 (2), 131-42.

Hansen, I.B. (1974). Effects of feedback, learner control, and cognitive abilities on state anxiety and performance in a computer-assisted instruction task. Journal of Educational Psychology 66(2), 247-54.

Hartley, J.R. (1985). Some psychological aspects of computer-assisted learning and teaching. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 22(2), 140-49.

Heckhausen, H., Schmalt, H.-D. & Schneider, K. (1985). Achievement motivation in perspective (M. Woodruff & R. Wicklund, trans.). Orlando, FL: Academic. (Original work published in 1979.)

Hicken, S., Sullivan, H. & Klein, J. (1992). Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer-delivered instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(4), 15-26.

Higginbotham-Wheat, N. (1988, Nov.). Perspectives on implementation of learner control in CBI. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Lexington, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 305 898.)

Hintze, H., Mohr, H. & Wenzel, A. (1988). Students' attitudes towards control methods in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 4(l), 3-10.

Holland, J.G. (1977). Variables in adaptive decisions in individualized instruction. Educational Psychologist 12(2), 146-6 1.

Holmes, N., Robson, E.H. & Steward, A.P. (1985). Learner control in computer-assisted learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 1(2), 99-107.

Hooper, S., Terniyakarn, C. & Williams, M.D. (1993). Effects of cooperative learning and learner control on high- and average-ability students. Educational Technology Research and Development 41 (2), 5-18.

Humphreys, M.S. & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review 91(2), 153-84.

Hurlock, R.E., Lahey, G.F. & McCann, PH. (1974). Student-controlled versus program-controlled CAI. San Diego, CA: Naval Personnel Research and Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 089 68 1.)

Jacobson, E. & Thompson, M. (1975). Self-managed learning using CAI Washington, DC: National Institute of Education and National Science Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 104 362.)

Johansen, K.J. & Tennyson, R.D. (1983). Effect of adaptive advisement on perception in learner-controlled, computer-based instruction using a rule-learning task. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 31(4), 226-36.

Jonassen, D.H. (1985). Learning strategies: a new educational technology. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 22 (1), 26-34.

— , & Hannum, W.H. (1987). Research-based principles for designing computer software. Educational Technology 27 (12),7-14.

— , Wilson, B.G., Wang, S. & Grabinger, R.S. (1993). Constructivist uses of expert systems to support learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 20(3), 86-94.

Judd, W.A. (1972). Learner-controlled computer-based instruction. Paper presented at the International School on Computers in Education, Pugniochiuso, Italy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 072 635.)

— , Bunderson, CX & Bessent, E.W. (1970). An investigation of the effects of learner control in computer-assisted instruction prerequisite mathematics (MATHS). Austin, TX: University of Texas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 053 532.)

— , Daubek, K. & O'Neil, H.F., Jr. (1975). Individual differences in learner-controlled CAI Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 107 215.)

— , O'Neil, H.F., Jr. & Spelt RE (1974a). Individual differences and learner control II: investigation of control over pictorial mediators in computer-assisted instruction. Lowry AFB, CO: Air Force Human Resources Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 094 733.)

— & — (1974b). Individual differences and learner control I. program development and investigation of control over mnemonics in computer-assisted instruction. Lowry AFB, CO: Air Force Human Resources Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 094 732.)

Keller, F.S. (1974). Ten years of personalized instruction. Teaching of Psychology 1(1), 4-9.

Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed. Instructional-design theories and models, 386-434. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

— (1987a). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction 26(8), 1-7.

— (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance & Instruction, 26(9-10), 1-8.

Kinzie, M.B. (1990), Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development 38(l), 1-2 1.

— & Sullivan, H.J. (1989). Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI. Educational Technology Research and Development 37(2), 5-14.

— , Sullivan, H.J. & Berdel, R.L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 80(3), 299-303.

Klein, J.D. & Keller, J.M. (1990). Influence of student ability, locus of control, and type of instructional control on performance and confidence. Journal of Educational Research 83(3),140-46.

Kukla, A. (1978). An attributional theory of choice. In L. Berkowitz, ed. Advances in experimental social Psychology: Vol. 11, 113-44. New York: Academic.

Lahey, G.F. (1978). Learner control of computer-assisted instruction: a comparison to guided instruction. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Dallas, TX (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 165 716.)

— & Coady, J.D. (1978). Learner control of instructional sequence in computer-based instruction: a comparison to programmed control. San Diego, CA: Naval Personnel Research and Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 211 049.)

— Crawford, A.M. & Hurlock, R.E. (1976). Learner control of lesson strategy. a model for PLATO IV system lessons. San Diego, CA: Naval Personnel Research and Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 125 543.)

— Hurlock, R.E. & McCann, P.H. (1973). Post lesson remediation and student control of branching in computer-based training. San Diego, CA: Naval Personnel Research and Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 083 797.)

Laurillard, D.M. (1987). Computers and the emancipation of students: giving control to the learner. Instructional Science 16(1),3-18.

Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development 41 (3), 4-16.

Lee, S.S.& Wong, S.C.H. (1989). Adaptive program vs. learner control strategy on computer-aided learning of gravimetric stoichiometry problems. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 21 (4), 367-79.

— & Lee, Y.H.K. (1991). Effects of learner-control versus program-control strategies on computer-aided learning of chemistry problems: for acquisition or review? Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (4), 491-98.

Lepper, M.R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: motivational and social issues. American Psychologist 40(l), 1-18. & Chabay, R.W. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and instruction: conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education. Educational Psychologist 20 (4),217-30.

Lichtenstein, S. & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 20(2), 159-83.

Lopez, C.L. & Harper, M. (1989). The relationship between learner control of CAI and locus of control among Hispanic students. Educational Technology Research and Development 37(4),19-28.

MacGregor, S.K. (1988). Instructional design for computer-mediated text systems: effects of motivation, learner control, and collaboration on reading performance. Journal of Experimental Education 56(3), 142-47.

Maehr, M.L. (1976). Continuing motivation: an analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Review of Educational Research 46(3), 443-62.

Mayer, R.E. (1976). Some conditions of meaningful learning for computer programming: advance organizers and subject control of frame order. Journal of Educational Psychology 68(2),143-50.

McCann, P.H., Lahey, G.F. & Hurlock, R.E. (1973). A comparison of student options versus program controlled CAI training. San Diego, CA: Naval Personnel Research and Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 081 233.)

McCombs, B.L. (1982). Learner satisfaction, motivation, and performance: capitalizing on strategies for positive self-control. National Society for Performance and Instruction Journal 21(4), 3-6.

— (1984). Processes and skills underlying continuing intrinsic motivation to learn: toward a definition of motivational skills training interventions. Educational Psychologist 19(4),199-218.

— & Marzano, R.J. (1990). Putting the self in self-regulated learning: the self as agent in integrating will and skill. Educational Psychologist 25(l), 51-70.

— & McDaniel, M.A. (198 1). On the design of adaptive treatments for individualized instructional systems. Educational Psychologist 16(l), 11-22.

McGrath, D. (1992). Hypertext, CAI, paper, or program control: do learners benefit from choices? Journal of Research on Computing in Education 24(4), 513-32.

McNeil, B.J. & Nelson, K.R. (1991). Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: a 10-year review of achievement effects. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 18(l), 1-6.

Medway, F.J. & Venino, G.R. (1982). The effects of effort feedback and performance patterns on children's attributions and task persistence. Contemporary Educational Psychology 7(l), 26-34.

Merrill, M.D. (1973). Premises, propositions and research underlying the design of a learner-controlled computer assisted instruction system: a summary of the TICCIT system. Working paper No. 44. Provo, UT. Division of Instructional Sciences, Brigham Young University.

— (1975). Learner control: beyond aptitude-treatment interactions. AV Communication Review 23(2), 217-26.

— (1983). Component display theory. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed. Instructional-design theories and models, 279-334. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Merrill, M.D. (1984). What is learner control? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298 905.)

Meyer, N.E. & Dyck, D.G. (1986). Effects of reward-schedule parameters and attribution retraining on children's attributions and reading persistence. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24(l), 65-68.

Milheim, W.D. (1989, Feb.). Perceived attitudinal effects of various types of learner control in an interactive video lesson. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 308 .828.)

— (1990). The effects of pacing and sequence control in an interactive video lesson. Educational & Training Technology International 27(l), 7-19.

— & Martin, B.L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 18(3), 99-105.

Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M. & Baldwin, W. (1992). Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(l), 5-13.

Murphy, M.A. & Davidson, GX (1991). Computer-based adaptive instruction: effects of learner control on concept learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 18 (2),51-56.

Nelson, T.O., Leonesio, R.J., Shimamura, A.P., Landwehr, R.F. & Narens, L. (1982). Overlearning and the feeling of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8(4), 279-88.

Newkirk, R.L. (1973). A comparison of learner control and machine control strategies for computer-assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 10(2),82-91.

Olivier, W.P. (1971, Feb.). Learner and program-controlled sequences of computer-assisted instruction. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 046 246.)

O'Shea, T., & Self, J. (1983). Learning and teaching with computers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Penland, P. (1979). Self-initiated learning. Adult Education 29(3),170-79.

Peters, C.L. (1988). The effects of advisement, content mapping, and interactive video on learner control and achievement in computer-based instruction. Dissertation Abstracts International 50(2), 348A.

Pitz, G.F. & Sachs, N.J. (1984). Judgment and decision: theory and application. Annual Review of Psychology 35, 139-63.

Pollock, J.C. & Sullivan, H.J. (1990). Practice mode and learner control in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 15(3), 251-60.

Popper, K.W. (1968). Conjectures and refutations in the growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Postlethwait, S.N., Novak, J. & Murray, H.T., Jr. (1972). The audio-tutorial approach to learning, 3d ed. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.

Pridemore, D.R. & Klein, J.D. (1991). Control of feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 39(4), 27-32.

Reeves, T.C. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: the case of learner control research, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 20(2), 39-46.

Reigeluth, C.M. (1979). TICCIT to the future: advances in instructional theory for CAI. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 6(2), 40-46.

— & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16(l), 1-10.

— & Stein, F.S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed. Instructional-design theories and models, 335-82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reinking, D. & Schreiner, R. (1985). The effects of computer-mediated text on measures of reading comprehension and reading behavior. Reading Research Quarterly 22 (5),536-52.

Reiser, R.A. (1987). Instructional technology: a history. In R.M. Gagne, ed. Instructional technology. Foundations, 11-48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Relan, A. (1991). Effects of two levels of strategy training and learner control on performance and choice behavior in a computer-based concept-classification task. Dissertation Abstracts International 52(11), 3895-A.

Revelle, W. & Michaels, E.J. (1976). The theory of achievement motivation revisited: the implications of inertial tendencies. Psychological Review 83(5), 394-404.

Rivers, L.C. (1972). Development and assessment of an adaptive strategy utilizing regression analysis for the presentation of instruction via computer (Tech. Rep. No. 27). Florida State University, Computer-Assisted Instruction Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 077 228.)

Robson, E.H., Steward, A.P. & Whitfield, G.E. (1988). Pupils' choices in learning with computers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 4(2), 93-102.

Romiszowski, A.J. (1986). Developing auto-instructional materials. New York: Nichols.

Ross, S.M & Morrison, G.R. (1988). Adapting instruction to learner performance and background variables. In D.H. Jonassen, ed. Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware, 227-46. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

— & — (1989). In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control. Educational Technology Research and Development 37(l), 19-33.

— & O'Dell, J.K. (1988). Obtaining more out of less text in CBI: effects of varied text density as a function of learner characteristics and control strategy. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 36(3), 131-142.

— &— (1989). Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 37(4), 29-39.

— & Rakow, E.A. (1981). Learner control versus program control as adaptive strategies for selection of instructional support on math rules. Journal of Educational Psychology 73(5), 745-53.

— , — , & Bush, A.J. (1980). Instructional adaptation for self-managed learning systems. Journal of Educational Psychology 72(3), 312-20,

Rossett, A. & Gautier-Downes, J. (1991). A handbook of job-aids. San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer.

Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, I (whole no. 609).

Saba, F. & Shearer, R.L. (1993, Jan.). Instructional transactions in distance education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans, LA.

Salomon, G. (1983). The e differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist 18(l), 42-50.

— (1985). Information technologies: what you see is not (always) what you get. Educational Psychologist 20 (4),207-16.

— & Gardner, H. (1986). The computer as educator. Lessons from television research. Educational Researcher 15 (1),13-19.

Santiago, R.S. & Okey, J.R. (1992). The effects of advisement and locus of control on achievement in learner-controlled instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 19 (2),47-53.

Sasscer, M.F. & Moore, D.M. (1984). A study of the relationship between learner control patterns and course completion in computer-assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 21(l), 28-33.

Schloss, P.J., Sindelar, P.T., Cartwright, G.P. & Smith, M.A. (1988). Learner control over feedback as a variable in computer assisted instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 20 (4), 310-20.

— , Wisniewski, L.A. & Cartwright G.P. (1988). The differential effect of learner control and feedback in college students' performance on CAI modules. Journal of Educational Computing Research 4(2), 141-50.

Schunk, D.H. (1982). Effects of effort attributional. Feedback on children's perceived self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 74(4), 548-56.

— (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 75(6), 848-56.

— (1990a, Apr.). Socialization and the development of self-regulated learning: the role of attributions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 317 581.)

— (1990b). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 25(l), 71-86.

— & Cox, P.D. (1986). Strategy training and attributional feedback with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology 78(3), 201.-09.

Seidel, R.J., Wagner, H., Rosenblatt R.D., Hillelsohn, M.J. & Stelzer, J. (1975). Learner control of instructional sequencing within an adaptive tutorial CAI environment (Report No. HumRRO-TR-75-7). Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED Ill 338.)

Seymour, S.L., Sullivan, H.J., Story, N.O. & Mosley, M.L. (1987). Microcomputers and continuing motivation. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 35(1),18-23.

Shyu, H.-Y. & Brown, S.W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: what are the effects in procedural learning? International Journal of Instructional Media 19(2), 85-96.

Stavin, R.E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: an alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher 15(9), 5-11.

Smallwood, R.D. (1962). A decision structure for teaching machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Snow, R.E. (1979, Apr.). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 180 447.)

— (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educational Psychologist 15(3), 151-58.

— & Yalow, E. (1982). Education and intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg, ed. Handbook of human intelligence, 493-585. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Steinberg, E.R. (1977). Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 3(3),84-90.

— (1984). Teaching computers to teach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

— (1989). Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977-88. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16 (4),117-24.

— , Baskin, A.B. & Hofer, E. (1986). Organizational/memory tools: a technique for improving problem solving skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2(2), 169-87.

Strickland, S. & Wilcox, W.C. (1978). Regression study of learner control data. Washington, DC, National Science Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 208 012.)

Suppes, P. (1966). The uses of computers in education. Scientific American 215(3), 206-20.

Temiyakarn McDonald, C.S. (1993). Learner-controlled lesson in cooperative learning group during computer-based instruction. Dissertation Abstracts International 54 (12),4414-A.

Tennyson, C.L., Tennyson, R.D. & Rothen, W. (1980). Content structure and instructional control strategies as design variables in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 72(4), 499-505.

Tennyson, R.D. (1980). Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 72(4), 525-32.

— (1981). Use of adaptive information for advisement in learning concepts and rules using computer-assisted instruction. American Educational Research Journal 18 (4),425-38.

— & Buttrey, T. (1980). Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 28(3),169-76.

— , Christensen, D.L. & Park, O.-C. (1984). The Minnesota Adaptive Instructional System: a review of its theory and research. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 11 (1),2-13.

— & Park, O.-C. (1984). Computer-based adaptive instructional systems: a review of empirically based models. Machine-Mediated Learning 1(2), 129-53.

— & Christensen, D.L. (1985). Adaptive control of learning time and content sequence in concept learning using computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 77(4),481-91.

— , & Rothen, W. (1979). Management of computer-based instruction: design of an adaptive control strategy. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 5(3), 63-7 1.

— , Welsh, J.C., Christensen, D.L. & Hajovy, H. (1985). Interactive effect of information structure, sequence of information, and process learning time on rule teaming using computer-based instruction. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 33(3), 213-33.

Thomas, E.A.C. (1983). Notes on effort and achievement-oriented behavior. Psychological Review 90(l), 1-20.

Tobias, S. (1976). Achievement-treatment interactions. Review of Educational Research 46(l), 61-74.

— (1981). Adapting instruction to individual differences among students. Educational Psychologist 16(2), 111-20.

— (1987a). Mandatory text review and interaction with student characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology 79(2),154-61.

— (1987b). Learner characteristics. In R.M. Gagne, ed. Instructional technology: foundations, 207-31. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Trumbull, D., Gay, G. & Mazur, J. (1992). Students' actual and perceived use of navigational and guidance tools in a hypermedia program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 24(3), 315-28.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning (OTA-SET-379). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Weiner, B. (1974). An attributional interpretation of expectancy-value theory. In B. Weiser, ed. Cognitive views of human motivation, 51-69. New York: Academic.

Williams, M.D. (1992). The differential effectiveness of attributional feedback and learner control in a computer-based economics lesson. Dissertation Abstracts International 53(l),129-A.

Wilson, B.G. & Jonassen, D.H. (1989). Hypertext and instructional design: some preliminary guidelines. Performance Improvement Quarterly 2(3), 34-49.

Wilcox, W.C. (1979, Apr.). Interaction of learner control and student aptitudes. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 208 011.)

— , Richards, B.F., Merrill, M.D., Christensen, D. & Rosenvall, J. (1978). Learner control of number of instances in a rule-using task Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 201 53 1.)

Wong, S.K.P. (1988). The effects of different visual strategies, selected individual differences, and learner control on student word-problem solving performance. Dissertation Abstracts International 49(6), 1366-A.

Zimmerman, B.J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist 25 (1),3-18.

— & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal 23(4),614-28.

— & — (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 80(3), 284-90.

— & — (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(l), 51-59.