|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
4. Learning by any other name: Communication Research Traditions in Learning
and Media
|
4. LEARNING BY ANY OTHER NAME: COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRADITIONS IN LEARNING AND MEDIAKathy A. Krendl, William H. Ware,Kim A. Reid, Ron WarrenINDIANA UNIVERSITY
Students learn from any medium, in school or out, whether they intend
to or not, whether it is intended or not that they should learn (as
millions of parents will testify), providing that the content of the
medium leads them to pay attention to it. Many teachers argue that learning
from media is not the problem; it is hard to prevent a student from
learning from media, and the real problem is to get him to learn what
he is intended to learn.... Therefore, a teacher can feel a great deal
of confidence that motivated students will learn from any medium if
it is competently used and adapted to their needs. The existing evidence
contributes to our confidence more in the media of instruction than
in our ability to discriminate among them (Schramm, 1977, p. 267). The history of
research on learning and media can be characterized as developing along
two distinct paths, one that examines the role of media in out-of-school
environments such as the home, and one that focuses on the role of media
as teaching tools within the formal classroom setting (see, for review,
Hornik, 1981; Krendl, 1989). Both of these research traditions trace
their origins back to the same original models and theories that introduced
the study of media and audiences. This chapter presents an overview
of the evolution of theoretical models and research orientations that
link these two traditions and that lay the foundation for future research
on learning and media. At the same time
that research on learning and media has evolved and changed over time,
so has the nature of the media systems examined. The media environment
has changed significantly in recent years from the predominance of broadcast
television as the delivery system of choice, characterized by its wide
appeal to mass audiences,its one-way delivery, and its highly centralized
distribution and production systems, to an environment characterized
by an entirely different set of features. First, this new
environment offers an increasingly wide array of technologies and combinations
of technologies (cable, videotape, DBS, computer, multimedia, etc.),
rather than one dominant medium (see Chapter
12 and 24.6). Second, these technologies
share characteristics that are in direct contrast to the earlier era
of broadcast television. That is, these delivery systems are driven
by their ability to serve small, specialized audiences--a narrow-cast
orientation--as opposed to television's broadcast orientation. Third,
they are designed to feature high levels of user control, flexibility,
and interactivity, as well as decentralized production and distribution
systems. As the media environment
has changed, the audience's relationship with media has changed. Audience
members now expect systems that are responsive to their unique needs
and interests. As consumer expectations have changed, inflexible, one-way
systems featuring limited channel and content capabilities are increasingly
threatened. Flexibility, user-friendliness, content diversity, and low
cost appear to be characteristics that will drive the development of
future media systems. The dramatic changes
in the dominant features that characterize emerging information and
entertainment technologies and the blurring of the boundaries between
what has traditionally been considered educational and what has traditionally
been considered entertainment content suggest the need for reconsideration
of the traditions, assumptions, and approaches used to study media and
learning to date. Today, with the growth of "edutainment"
products (products that combine elements of education and entertainment
programing and are designed for use at home and at school), the traditional
distinctions between research on learning in classrooms and on learning
in out-of-school environments seem increasingly arbitrary and counterproductive.
The following chapter is designed to provide a reconsideration of research
on media and learning with an emphasis on the need for an integrated
approach to the concepts, issues, and questions related to the field
in future research.
In this chapter,
we attempt to demonstrate the linkages between the two research traditions,
beginning with early communication models. In the discussion of the
research perspectives, we have focused on the definition of the approach,
the basic components of the models, assumptions that have guided inquiry
within the research orientations, and a discussion of representative
research. Implicit in the models is an assumed structure to the communication
process. The assumed structure has had profound implications for shaping
research questions and influencing the direction and evolution of research
within each particular research orientation. |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
AECT 877.677.AECT
(toll-free) |