35- References

Archer-Kath, J., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1994). Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology.

Adams, D., Carson, H. & Hamm, M. (1990). Cooperative learning and educational media Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Ames, R. & Lau, S. (1982). An attributional analysis of student help-seeking in academic settings. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 414-23.

Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, . CA: Sage.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Battista, M. & Clements, D. (1986). The effects of Logo and CAI problem-solving environments on problem-solving abilities and mathematics achievement. Computers in Human Behavior 2, 183-93.

Beane, W. & Lemke, E. (197 1). Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology 62 (3), 215-18.

Bearison, D. (1982). New directions in studies of social interaction and cognitive growth. In F. Serafica, ed. Socialcognitive development in context, 199-221. New York: Guildford.

Bearison, D., Magzamen, S. & Filardo, E. (1986). Sociocognitive conflict and cognitive growth in young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 32, 51-72.

Becker, H. (1984). School uses of microcomputers: reports firom a national survey (Issue No. 6). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.

(1985). The second national U.S. school users of microcomputers survey. Paper presented at the Second World. Conference on Computers in Education, Norfolk, VA.

& Sterling, C. (1987). Equity in schools computer use: national data and neglected considerations. Journal of Educational Computing Research 3, 289-3 11.

Berndt, T., Perry, T. & Miller, K. (1988). Friends' and classmates' interactions on academic tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 506-13.

Bonk, C., Medury, P. & Reynolds, T. (1995). Cooperative hypermedia: the marriage of collaborative writing and mediated environments. Computers in the Schools.

Carlson, H. & Falk, D. (1989). Effective use of interactive videodisc instruction in understanding, and implementing cooperative group learning with elementary pupils in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education 17 (3), 241-58.

Carrier, C. (1984). Do learners make good choices? A review of research on learner control in instruction. Instructional Innovator 29 (2), 15-17.

- & Sales, G. (1987). Pair versus individual work on the acquisition concepts in a computer-based instructional lesson. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 14 (1), 11-17.

Chernick, R. & White, M. (1981). Pupils' interaction with microcomputers vs. interaction in classroom settings. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Electronic Learning Laboratory.

- & White, M. (1983, May). Pupil cooperation in computer learning vs. leaming with classroom materials. Paper presented at the New York State Psychological Association, Liberty, NY.

Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research 53, 445-59.

Clements, D. (1986). Research on Logo and social development. Logo Exchange 5 (3), 22-24.

- & Nastasi, B. (1985). Effects of computer environments on social-emotional development: Logo and computer-assisted instruction. Computers in the Schools 2 (213), 11-3 1.

- & Nastasi, B. (1988). Social and cognitive interaction in educational computer environments. American Educational Research Journal 25, 87-106.

Cohen, E. Q 986). Designing groupwork. strategiesfor heterogeneous classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cosden, M. & English, J. (1987). The effects of grouping, self-esteem, and locus of control on microcomputer performance and help seeking by mildly handicapped students. Journal of Educational Computing Research 3, 443-60.

Cox, D. & Berger, C. (1985). The importance of group size in the use of problem-solving skills on a microcomputer. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1, 459-68.

Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: the classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

Dalton, D. (1990a). The effects of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during interactive video. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 17, 8-16.

(1990b, Apr.). The effects of prior learning on learner interaction and achievement during cooperative computerbased instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

Hannafin, M. & Hooper, S. (1989). Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development 37 (2), 15-24.

Damon, W. & Killen, M. (1982). Peer interaction and the process of change in children's moral reasoning. MerrillPalmer Quarterly 28, 347-67.

Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations 2, 129-52.

(1962). Cooperation and trust: some theoretical notes. In M.R. Jones, ed. Nebraska symposium on motivation, 275-319. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

DeVries, D. & Edwards, K. (1974). Student teams and learning games: their effects on cross-race and cross-sex interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (5), 741-49.

Dickson, W. & Vereen M. (1985). Two students at one microcomputer. Theory into Practice 22 (4), 296-300.

Druckman, D., Rozelle, R. & Baxter, J. (1982). Nonverbal communication: survey, theory, and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: what we've learned. Educational Leadership 51 (7), 4-10.

Dyer, L. (1993). An investigation of the effects of cooperative learning on computer monitored problem solving. University of Minnesota, Ph.D. dissertation.

Federico, R (1980). Adaptive instruction: trends and issues. In R. Snow, P. Federico & W. Montague, eds. Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 1. Cognitive process analysis of aptitude, 1-26. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fletcher, B. (1985). Group and individual learning of junior high school children on a micro-computer-based task. Educational Review 37, 252-61.

Frank, M. (1984). A comparison between an individual and group goal structure contingency that differed in the behavioral contingency and performance-outcome components (doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). Dissertation Abstracts International 45105, 1341-A.

Garhart, C. Hannafin, M. (1986). The accuracy of cognitive monitoring during computer-based instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 13, 88-93.

Hancock, V. & Betts, F. (1994). From the lagging to the leading edge. Educational Leadership 51 (7), 24-29.

Hannafin, M. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 7 (3), 6-10.

Hannafin, M. & Rieber, L. (1989). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based interactive technologies: Part H. Educational Technology Research and Development 37 (2), 102-14.

Hawkins, S., Sheingold, K., Gearhart, M. & Berger, C. (1982).

Microcomputers in schools: impact on the social life of elementary classrooms. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 3, 361-73.

Hill, G. (1982). Group versus individual performance: are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin 91, 517-39.

Hooper, S. (1992). Effects of peer interaction during computerbased mathematics instruction. Journal of Educational Research 85 (3), 180-189.

- (1992). Cooperation learning and computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 40 (3), 21-38.

- & Hannafin, M. (1988). Cooperative CBI: the effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous groups on the teaming of progressively complex concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research 4 (4),413-24.

- & - (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 39 (3), 27-40.

Temiyakam, C. & Williams, M. (1993). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on high- and average-ability students. Educational Technology Research and Development 41 (2).

Ward, T., Hannafin, M. & Clark, H. (1989). The effects of aptitude composition on achievement during small group learning. Journal of Cotriputer-Based Instruction 16, 102-09.

Hwong, N., Caswell, A., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1993). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning on prospective elementary teachers' music achievement and attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology 133 (1), 53-64.

Huang, C. (1993). The effects of feedback on performance and attitude in cooperative and individualized computer-based instruction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, doctoral dissertation.

Hythecker, V., Rocklin, T., Dansereau, D. Lambiotte, J., Larson, C. & O'Donnell, A. (1985). A computer-based learning strategy training module: development and evaluation. Journal of Educational Computer Research 1 (3), 275-83.

Innis, H. (1964). The bias of communication. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

(1972). Empire and communication. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, F. (1994). Joining together. group theory and group skills, *5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

- & Johnson, R. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research 49, 51-70.

- & - (1986). Computer-assisted cooperative learning.

Educational Technology 26 (1), 12-18.

- & - (1989). Cooperation and competition: theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.

- & - (1992a). Creative controversy: intellectual challenge in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction.

- & - (1992b). Positive interdependence: key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller, eds. Interaction in cooperative groups: the theoretical anatomy of group learning, 174-99. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

- & - (1992c). Positive interdependence: the heart of cooperative learning. Edina, MN: Interaction.

- & - (1994). Leading the cooperative schoot 2d ed. Edina, MN: Interaction.

- & Holubec, E. (1992). Advanced cooperative learning.

Edina, MN: Interaction.

- & Holubec, E. (1993). Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction.

- & Smith, K. (1991). Active learning: cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction.

- & Stanne, M. (1989). Impact of goal and resource interdependence on problem-solving success. Journal of Social Psychology 129 (5), 621-29.

-, Stanne, M. & Garibaldi, A. (1990). Ile impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology 130, 507-16.

-, Richards, S. & Buckman, L. (1986). The effect of prolonged implementation of cooperative learning on social support within the classroom. Journal of Psychology 1.19, 405-11.

Johnson, R. & Johnson, D.W. (1979). Type of task and student achievement and attitudes in interpersonal cooperation, competition, and individualization. Journal of Socia Psychology 116, 211-19.

- & Stanne, M. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 668-77. - & - (1986). A comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. American Educational Research Journal 23, 382-92.

-, -, Smizak & Avon (1987). Effect of composition pairs at the word processor on quality of writing and ability to use the word processor Minneapolis, MN: Cooperative Learning Center, University of Minnesota.

Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. (1984, Oct.). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39 (10), 1123-34.

King, A. (1989). Verbal interaction and problem solving within computer-assisted cooperative teaming groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research 5 (1), 1-15.

Lee, M. (1993). Gender, group composition, and peer interaction in computer-based cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 9 (4), 549-77.

Lehrer, R. & Smith, P. (1986, Apr.). Logo learning: are two heads better than one? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Lepper, M. & Gurtner 1. (1989). Children and computers: approaching the twenty-first century. American Psychologist 44 (2),170-78.

Levin, J. & Kareev, Y. (1980). Problem-solving in everyday situations. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Hwnan Cognition 2, 47-5 1.

Lew, M., Mesch, D., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1986a). Positive interdependence, academic and collaborativeskills group contingencies and isolated students. American Educational Research Journal 23, 476-88.

-, - & - (1986b). Components of cooperative learning: effects of collaborative skills and academic group contingencies on achievement and mainstrearning. Contemporary Educational Psychology 11, 229-39.

Love, W. (1969). Individual versus paired learning of an abstract algebra presented by computer assisted instruction. The Florida State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 034 403.)

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: the extensions of man. New York. New American Library.

McDonald, C. (1993). Learner-controlled lesson in cooperative learning groups during computer-based instruction.

University of Minnesota, Ph.D. dissertation.

Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Mesch, D., Lew, M., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1986). Isolated teenagers, cooperative learning and the training of social skills. Joumal of Psychology 120, 323-34.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1988). Impact of positive interdependence and academic group contingencies on achievement. Joumal of Social Psychology 128, 345-52.

Mevarech, Z., Stem, D. & Levita, 1. (1987). To cooperate or not to cooperate in CAI: that is the question. Journal of Educational Research 80 (3), 164-67.

Mevarech, Z., Silber, 0. & Fine, D. (1991). Learning with computers in small groups: cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research 7 (2), 233-43.

Mitheim, W. & Martin, B. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 18 (3), 99-105.

Mills, C. & Durden, W. (1992). Cooperative learning and ability groups: an issue of choice. Gifted Child Quarterly 36 (1),11-16.

Muller, A. & Perlmutter, M. (1985). Preschool children's problem-solving interactions at computers and jigsaw puzzles. Journal of Applied Developmental PsycAology 6, 173-86.

Mulryan, C. (1992). Student passivity during cooperative small groups in mathematics. Joumal of Educational Research 85, 261-73.

Murray, F. (1983). Cognitive benefits of teaching on the teacher Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Quebec.

Nastasi, B. & Clements, D. (1992). Social-cognitive behaviors and higher-order thinking in educational computer environments. Learning and Instruction 2, 215-38.

- & Battista, M. (1990). Social-cognitive interactions, motivation, and cognitive growth in logo programming and CAI problem-solving environments. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 150-58.

Noell, J. & Carnine, D. (1989). Group and individual computer-based video instruction. Educational Technology 29 (1),36-37.

Okey, J. & Majer, K. (1976). Individual and small-group learning with computer-assisted instruction. AV Communication Review 24 (1), 79-86.

Perret-Clermont, A. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. New York: Academic.

Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Postman, N. (1985). Ourselves to death: public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Viking Penguin.

Reigeluth, C. & Stein, F. (1983). The elaborative theory of instruction. In C. Reigeluth, ed. Instructional design theories and models, 335-82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum-

Repman, J. (1993). Collaborative, computer-based learning: cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research 9 (2), 149-63.

Riel, M. (1990). Cooperative learning across classrooms in electronic learning circles. Instructional Science 19, 445-66.

Robinson, A. (t990) Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Joumal of Education of the Gifted 14 (3),9-27.

Rocklin, T., O'Donnell, A., Dansereau, D., Lambiotte, J.,

Hythecker, V. & Larson, C. (1985). Training learning strategies with computer-aided cooperative learning. Computers in Education 9 (1), 67-7 1.

Rubin, A. (1983). The computer confronts language arts: cans and shoulds for education. In A. Wilkinson, ed. Classroom computers and cognitive science, 201-18. San Diego, CA: Academic.

Rysavy, D. & Sales, G. (1991). Cooperative learning in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 39 (2), 70-79.

Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist 18 (1), 42-50.

(1985). Information technologies: what you see is not (always) what you get. Educational Psychologist 20 (4)1207-16.

Sarason, 1. & Potter, E. (1983). Self-monitoring: cognitive processes, and perfonnance. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.

Shlechter, T. (1990). The relative instructional efficiency of small group computer-based training. Journal of Educational Computing Research 6, 329-41.

Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, England: Wiley.

Showers, C. & Cantor, N. (1985). Social cognition: a look at motivated strategies. In M. Rosenzweig & L. Porter, eds. Annual review ofpsychology, Vol. 36, 275-306. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

Siann, G. & MacLeod, G. (1986). Computers and children of primary school age: issues and questions. British Journal of Educational Technology 17,133-44.

Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S. & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 157-87.

Simpson, J. (1986). Computers and collaborative work among students. Educational Technology 26 (10), 37-44.

Simsek, A. & Hooper, S. (1992). The effects of cooperative versus individual videodisc learning on student performance and attitudes. International Journal o Instructional If Media 19 (3), 209-18.

Simsek, A. & Tsai, B. (1992). The impact of cooperative group composition on student performance and attitudes during interactive videodisc instruction. Joumal of ComputerBased Instruction 19 (3), 86-9 1.

Slavin, R. (1986). Using student team learning. Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.

Leavey, M. & Madden, N. (1982). Team-assisted individualization: Mathematics teacher~ manual. Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.

Snow, R. (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educational Psychologist 15, 151-58.

Steinberg, E. (1977). Review of student control in computerassisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 3 (3),84-90.

- (1984). Teaching computers to teach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

- (1989). Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977-88. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16 (4),117-24.

Stephenson, S. (1992). Effects of student-instructor interaction

. and paired/individual study on achievement in computer based training (CBT). Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 19(t),22-26.

Swing, S. & Peterson, P (1982). The relationship of student ability and small group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal 19, 259-74.

Tennyson, R., Christensen, D. & Park, 0. (1984). The Minnesota Adaptive Instructional System: a review of its theory and research. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 11 (1),2-13.

Trevino. L., Lengel, R. & Daft, R. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research 14,553-74.

Tobias, S. (1987). Mandatory text review and interaction with student characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology 79,154-61.

Trowbridge, D. & Durnin, R. (1984). Results front an investigation ofgroups working at the computer Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Turk, S. & Sarason, 1. (1983). Test anxiety and causal attributions. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Department of Psychology.

Underwood, G. & McCaffrey, M. (1990). Gender differences in a cooperative computer-based language task. Educational Research 32, 44-49.

Webb, N. (1982). Group composition, group interaction, and

achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal Educational Psychology 74 (4), 475-84.

- (1984). Microcomputer lean-Ling in small groups: cognitive requirements and group processes. Journal of Educational Psychology 76, 1076-88.

- (1987). Peer interaction and learning with computers in small groups. Computers in Human Behavior 3, 193-209.

- (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research 13, 21-39.

Ender, P. & Lewis, S. (1986). Problem solving strategies and group processes in small group learning computer programming. American Educational Research Journal 23 (2),243-61.

Vtrillis, S. (1990). Cooperative learning fallout. ASCD Update 32(8),6,8.

Yager, S., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1985). Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative leaming groups. Journal of Educational Psychology 77 (1), 6"6.

Yueh, J. & Alessi, S. (1988). The effects of reward structure and group ability composition on cooperative computerassisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 15,18-22.

Zimmerman, B. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology 11, 303-13.