32. - References

Ahmad, M. (1988). The effect of computer-based feedback on using cognitive strategies of problem solving. Proceedings of selected research papers, Association for F-4ucational Communications and Technology, Research and Theory Division (pp. 1-22). New Orleans, LA.

Anderson, J.R., Conrad, C.G. & Corbett, A.T. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP Tutor. Cognitive Science 13, 467-505.

Anderson, R.C. & Faust, G.W. (1967). The effects! of strong formal prompts in programmed instruction. :American Educational Research Journal 4, 345-52.

-, Kulhavy, R.W. & Andre, T. (1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of E~ucationalPsychology 62, 148-56. i

-,Kulhavy, R.W. & Andre, T. (1972). Conditions under which feedback facilitates learning from programmed lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 1 ~6-88

Andre, T. & Thieman, A. (1988). Level of adjunction question, type of feedback, and learning concepts by! reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology 13, 296~JOT

Balzer, W.K., Doherty, M.E. & O'Connor, R. (198q). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psy4hological Bulletin 106, 410-33.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review 84 (2), 191-215.

- (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human aging. American Psychologist 37 (2), 122-47. i

- (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist 28, 1 It-48.

Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulik, C.C., Kulik, J.A. & Morgan, M.T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research 61 (2), 218-38.

Bardwell, R. (198 1). Feedback: how does it functionl! Journal of Experimental Education 50, 4-9.

Barringer, C. & Gholson, B. (1979). Effects of type and combination of feedback upon conceptual learning byl children: implications for research in academic learning. Review of Educational Research 49 (3), 459-78.

Bireftbaum, M. & Tatsuoka, K.K. (1987). Effects of ','on-line" test feedback on the seriousness of subsequent error~. Journal of Educational Measurement 24 (2), 145-55.

Bimey, R.C., Burdick, H. & Teevan, R.C. (1969)' Fear of failure. New York: Van Nostrand.

Bodner, G.M. (1986). Constructivism: a theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63.

Boekaerts, M. (1994). Action control: how relevant is it for classroom learning? In 1. Kuhl & J. Beckmann, eds. Volition and personality: action versus state orfentatioi4 427-35. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

Brackbill, Y., Bravos, A. & Starr, R.H. (1962). Delay improved retention of a difficult task. Journal of Comparative Psychology 55, 947-52.

& Kappy, M.S. (1962). Delay of reinforcement and retention. Journal of Comparative and Physiological P#chology 55,14-18.

Briggs, L.J. & Hamilton, N.R. (1964). MeaningfuI learning and retention: practice and feedback variables. Review of Educational Research 34, 545-58.

Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, R (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18 (1),32-42.

Burbules, N.C. & Linn, M.C. (1988). Response to contradiction: scientific reasoning during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 67-75.

Butler, D.L. & Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65 (3), 245-81.

Butterfield, E.C., Nelson, T.O. & Peck, V. (1988). Developmental aspects of the feeling of knowing. Developmental Psychology 24 (5), 654-63.

Carter, J. (1984). Instructional leamer feedback: a literature review with implications for software development. The Computing Teacher 12 (2),53-55.

Carver, C.S. & Scheier, M.F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: a control-process view. Psychological Review 97, 19-35.

Chanond, K. (1988). The effects of feedback, correctness of response and response confidence on learners' retention in computer-assisted instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International 49, 1358A.

Char, R.O. (1978). The effect of delay of informative feedback on the retention of verbal information and higher-order learning, for college students. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International 40,748A.

Chinn, C.A. & Brewer, W.F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research 63, 1-49.

Clariana, R.B., Ross, S.M. & Morrison, G.R. (1991). The effects of different feedback strategies using computeradministered multiple-choice questions as instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development 39 (2),5-17.

Clark, R.E., Aster, D. & Hession, M.A. (1987, Apr.). When teaching kills learning: types of mathemathantic effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher 19 (6), 2-10.

-(1991 a). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology 31 (5), 34-40.

-(1991b). Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology 31 (9), 16-18.

-(1992a). The Jasper experiment: an exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development 40 (1), 65-80.

-(1992b). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist 27 (3), 291-315.

Cohen, V.B. (1985). A reexarnination of feedback in computerbased instruction: implications for instructional design. Educational Technology 25 (1), 33-37.

Collins, A., Brown, J.S. & Newman, S.E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick, ed. Learning, knowing, and instruction: essays in honor of Robert Glaser 453-94. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cooper, P.A. (1993). Paradigm shifts in designed instruction: from behaviorism to cognitivisin to constructivism. Educational Technology, May 1993,! 12-19.

Covington, M.V. (1983). Motivated cognitions. In S.G. Paris, G.M. Olson & H.W. Stevenson, ed& Learning and motivation in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: ',Erlbaum.

- & Omelich, C.L. (1979). Are causal attributions causal? A path analysis of the cognitive model of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37,1487-1504.

- & Omelich, C.L. (1981). As failures mount: affective and cognitive consequences of ability demotion in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 73, 796-808.

- & - (1982). Achievement anxiety, performance and behavioral instruction: a cost/beriefits analysis. In R. Schwarzer, H. van der Ploeg & C.:~ Speilberger, eds. Test anxiety research, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.

- & - (1984). Task-oriented versus competitive learning structures: motivational and perfoi~mance consequences. Journal of Educational Psychology 6 (6), 1038-50.

Deci, E.L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 22 (1),113-20.

Dempsey, JX (1988). The effects of four methods of immediate corrective feedback on retention~! discrimination error, and feedback study time in comptiter-based instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida Sta~e University, 1988.) Dissertation Abstracts International 49, 1434A.

- & Driscoll, M.P. (1994). Conceptual error and feedback. the relationship between content anal~sis and confidence of response. Manuscript submitted for publication.

- & Wager, S.U. (1988). A taxonomy for the timing of feedback in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology 28 (10), 20-25.

Driscoll, M.P. & Litchfield, B.C. (1093). Feedback, retention, discrimination error, and feedback study time. Journal ofResearch on Computing in Education 25 (3), 303-26.

Driscoll, M.P. & Swindell, L.K.: (1993). Text-based feedback. In JX Dempsey & G.C. $ales, eds. Interactive instruction and feedback, 21-54. E 1 lewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Driscoll, M.P. (1990, Aug. 30). Personal communication.

Duffy, T.M. & Jonassen, D. (1991). Constructivism: new implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, May 1991, 7-12.

Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational proces$es affecting learning. American Psychologist 41 (10), 1040-48.

Dweck, C.S. & Legget, E.L. (1988).,: A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychology Review 95 (2), 256-73.

Edwards, L.D. (1991). Children's learning in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2J (2), 122-37.

Eisenberger, R. (1992). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review 99, 248-67.

Elawar, M.C. & Como, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written feedback on student homework: changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Joumal of Educational Psychology 77, 162-73.

Elley, W.B. (1966). The role of errors in learning with feedback. British Journal of Educational Psychology 35-36, 296-300. Erez, M. & Zidon, 1. (1984). Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 69, 69-78.

Fischer, P.M. & Mandl, H. (1988). Knowledge acquisition by computerized audio-visual feedback. European Journal of Psychology of Education 111, 217-33.

Forsyth, D.R. & McMillan, J.H. (1981). Attributions, affect, and expectations: a test of Weiner's three-dimensional model. Journal of Educational Psychology 73(3), 393-403.

Gagne, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning, 4th ed. New York: CBS College.

Briggs, L.J. & Wager, W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design, 4th ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. & Driscoll, M.P. (1988). Essentials of leamingfor instruction, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gaynor, P. (1981). The effect of feedback delay on retention of computer-based mathematical material. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 8 (2), 28-34.

Gilman, D.A. (1969). Comparison of several feedback methods for correcting errors by computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 60 (6), 503-08.

Hanna, G.S. (1976). Effects of total and partial feedback in multiple-choice testing upon learning. Journal of Educational Research 69, 202-05.

Hannafin, M.J. (1989). Interactive strategies and emerging instructional technologies: psychological perspectives. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication 18 (3),167-80.

Hannafin, M.F., Hannafin, K.M. & Dalton, D.W. (1993). Feedback and emerging instructional technologies. In JX Dempsey & G.C. Sales, eds. Interactive Instruction and Feedback 263-86. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Hoska, D.M. (1993). Motivating learners through CBI feedback: developing a positive learner perspective. In JX Dempsey & G.C. Sales, eds. Interactive Instruction and Feedback, 105-32. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Jacobs, J.W. & Dempsey, JX (1993). Simulation and gaming: fidelity, feedback, and motivation. In JX Dempsey & G.C. Sales, eds. Interactive instruction andfeedback 197-227. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, RX (1993). Cooperative learning and feedback in technology-based instruction. In JX Dempsey & G.C. Sales, eds. Interactive instruction and feedback 133-57. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Jonassen, D.H. (1991a). Context is everything. Educational Technology 31 (6), 33-34.

(1991b). Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development 39 (3), 5-14.

(1993). Conceptual frontiers in hypertnedia environments for learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2 (4), 331-35.

Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed. Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status, 383-434. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

- (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development 10 (3), 2-10.

- (1987b). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction 26 (8), 1-7.

- (1987c). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction 26 (9), 1-8.

- & Kopp, T. (1987). An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed. instructional theories in action: lessons illustrating selected iheories and models, 289-320. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

- & Suzuki, K. (1987). Use of ARCS motivation model in courseware design. In D.H. Jonassen, ed. Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware, 409-34. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kelley, H.H. (1973). The processes of causal:1 attribution. American Psychologist 28, 107-28.

Klausmeier, H.J. (1976). Instructional design and the teaching of concepts. In J.R. Levin & V.L. Allen, eds. Cognitive learning in children, 191-217. New York: Academic.

Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M. & Koestner, J. (1087). Praise involvement and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (2), 383-90.

Kowitz, G.T. & Smith, J.C. (1985). The dynamics of successful feedback. Performance & Instruction Journal 1, Oct., 4-6.

- & - (1987). The four faces of feedback. Performance & Instruction, Oct., 33-36.

Kozma, R. & Bangert-Drowns, R.L. (1987). 1~ Design in context: a conceptual framework for the study of computer software in higher education. Ann Arbor, M11 University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. ERIC: Document Reproduction Service No. 287 436.

Kuhl, J. & Goschke, T. (1994). A theory of acoon control: mental subsystems, modes of control, and volitional conflict-resolution strategies. In J. Kuhl & Beckmann, eds. Volition and personality: action versus state orientation, 93-124. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

Kulhavy, R.W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research 47 (1), 211-32.

- & Anderson, R.C. (1972). Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (5),505-12.

- & Parsons, J.A. (1972). Learning-criterion error perseveration in text materials. Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (1),81-86.

- & Stock, W.A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: the place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review 1 (4), 279-308.

Stock, W.A., Hancock, T.E., Swindell, L.K. &~Hamrnrichl P. (1990). Written feedback: response certitude and durability. Contemporary Educational Psychology 15, 31917-32.

-, Thornton, N.E., Winston, K.S. & Behrens, J.T (1990). Response feedback, certitude and learning : from text. British Journal of Educational Psychology 60, 161-70.

& Wager, W. (1993). Feedback in programmed iinstruction: historical context and implications for practice. In JX Dempsey & G.C. Sales, eds. Interactive 1 instruction and feedback, 3-20. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

White, M.T., Topp, B.W., Chan, A.L. & Adams, J. (1985). Feedback complexity and coffective efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10, 285-91.

Yekovich, F.R. & Dyer, J.W. (1976). Feedback and response confidence. Journal of Educational Psychology 68 (5),522-28.

- & (1979). Feedback and content review in programmed instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 4,91-98.

Kulik, J.A. & Kulik, C.-L.C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research 58 (1),79-97.

Lee, O.M. (1985). The effect of type of feedback on rule learning in computer-based instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International 46, 955A.

Lee, D., Smith, PL. & Savenye, W. (1991). The effects of feedback and second try in computer-assisted instruction for rule-learning task. Proceedings of selected research papers, Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Research and Theory Division, 441-32. Orlando, FL.

Lewis, M.W. &Anderson, J.R. (1985). Discrimination of operator schemata in problem solving: learning from examples. Cognitive Psychology 17, 26-65.

Lhyle, K.G. & Kulhavy, RX (1987). Feedback processing and error correction. Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (3),320-22.

Litchfield, B.C. (1987). The effect of presentation sequence and generalization formulae on retention of coordinate and successive concepts and rules in computer-based instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International 49, 486A.

Locke, E.A., Shaw, K.N., Saari, L.M. & Latham, G.R (1981). Goal setting and task perforinance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin 90, 125-52.

Malone, T.W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science 4, 333-69.

McCullers, J.C., Fabes, R.A. & Moran, J.D., In (1987). Does intrinsic motivation theory explain the adverse effects of rewards on immediate task performance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (5), 1027-33.

Merrill, J. (1987). Levels of questioning and forms of feedback: instructional factors in courseware design. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 14 (1), 18-22.

Merrill, M.D. (1983). Component display theory. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed. Instructional design theories and models, 279-333. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Merrill, M. & Tennyson, R. (1977). Teaching concepts: an instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Metcalfe, J. (1986). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12 (2),288-94.

Meyer, L. (1986). Strategies for correcting students' wrong responses. Elementary School Journal 87, 227-41.

Mithaug, D.E. (1993). SeVIregulation theory: how optimal adjustment maximizes growth. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Mory, E.H. (1991). The effects ofadaptivefeedback on student performance, feedback study time, and lesson efficiency within computer-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida State University, Tallahassee.

(1992). The use of informational feedback in instruction: implications for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development 40 (3), 5-20.

- (1994). The use of response certitude in adaptive feedback: effects on student performance, feedbac ciency. Journal of Educational Compu~ing

- (1995, Feb.). A new perspective on from objectivism to constructivism. P annual m ti- of the Association for study time, and effiResearch 11 (3). ructional feedback.#per presented at the Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, CA.

Nelson, T.O. (1988). Predictive accuracy of the feeling of knowing across different criterion task's and across different subject populations and individuals. In M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris & R.N. Sykes, eds. Practical Aspects ofMemory, Vol. 1, 190-96. New York: Wiley.

Leonesio, R.J., Landwehr, R.S. & Narens, L. (1986). A comparison of three predictors of an individual's memory performance: the individual's feelingl of knowing versus the normative feeling of knowing versus base-rate item difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology.* Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12 (2), 279-81.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Seligman, M.E. & Girgus, LS. (1986). Learned helplessness in children: a longitudinal study of depression, achievement, and explanatory style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 ~2j, 435-42.

Noonan, JX (1984). Feedbackproceduresin computer-assisted instruction: knowledge-of-results, knowledge-of-correctresponse, process explanations, and second attempts after errors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Park, O.C. & Tennyson, R.D. (1980). Computer-based response-sensitive design strategies for 4electing presentation form and sequence of examples in learning of coordinate concepts. Journal ofEducational PsycWogy 78 (2), 153-58.

Peeck, J. (1979). Effects of differential feedback on the answering of two types of questions by fifth- and sixth-graders. British Journal of Educational Psychology 49, 87-92.

& Tillema, H.H. (1979). Delay of feedback and retention of correct and incorrect responses. Journal of Experimental Education 47, 171-78.

van den Bosch, A.B. & Kreupeling, W.J. (1985). Effects of informative feedback in relation to retention of initial responses. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10,303-13.

Perkins, D.N. & Simmons, R. (1988). Patterns of misunderstanding: an integrative model for science, math, and programming. Review ofEducational Rlesearch 58, 303-26.

Peterson, S.K. & Swindell, L.K. (1991,'Apr.). The role of feedback in written instruction: recent th Paper presented at the annual meeting Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Phye, G.D. (1979). The processing of informative feedback about multiple-choice test performauce. Contemporary Educational Psychology 4, 381-94.

- & Andre, T. (1989). Delayed retentiOn effect: attention, perseveration, or both? Contemporary Educational Psychology 14, 173-85.

-&Bender, T. (1989). Feedback complexity and practice: response pattern analysis in retention d transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology 14, 97~1 10.

-Gughamella, J. & Sola, J. (1976). Effects of delayed retention on multiple-choice test performa~,ce. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1, 26-36.

Pressey, S.L. (1926). A simple device which gives tests and scores-and teaches. School and Society 23, 373-76.(1927). A machine for the automatic teaching of drill material. School and Society 25, 549-52.

Reigeluth, C.M. & Stein, F.S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed. Instructional design theories and models, 335-8 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbauni.

Richards, D.R. (1989). A comparison of three computergenerated feedback strategies. Proceedings of selected research papers, Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Research and Theory Division, 357-68, Dallas, TX.

Rieber, L.P. (1992). Computer-based microworlds: a bridge between constructivism and direct instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development 41 (1), 93-106.

Roper, W.J. (1977). Feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 14,43-49.

Sales, G.C. (1993). Adapted and adaptive feedback in technology-based instruction. In JX Dempsey & G.C. Sales, eds. Interactive instruction andjeedback, 159-75. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Salomon, G. & Globerson, T. (1987). Skill may not be enough: the role of mindfulness in leaming and transfer. International Journal ofEducational Research 11, 623-37.

- & Perkins, D.N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist 24, 113-42.

Sassenrath, J.M. (1975). Theory and results on feedback and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology 67 (6), 894-99.

- & Garverick, C.M. (1965). Effects of differential feedback from examinations on retention and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 56 (5), 259-63.

- & Yonge, G.D. (1968). Delayed information feedback, feedback cues, retention set, and delayed retention. Journal of Educational Psychology 59 (2), 69-73.

- & - (1969). Effects of delayed information feedback and feedback cues in learning on delayed retention. Journal of Educational Psychology 60 (3), 174-77.

Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 498-504.

(1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology 85, 406-11.

Crouse, A. & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology 84,435-43.

Schmidt, R.A., Young, D.E. Sinnen, S. & Shapiro, D.C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15 (2), 352-59.

9chooler, L.J. & Anderson, J.R. (1990). The disruptive potential of immediate feedback. Proceedings of the Twetfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 702-08, Cambridge, MA.

Schimmel, B.J. (1983, Apr.). A meta-analysis of feedback to learners in computerized and programmed instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 233 708.

- (1988). Providing meaningful feedback in courseware. In D.H. Jonassen, ed. Instructional designsfor microcomputer

courseware, 183-95. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaurn.

Schloss, P.J., Sindelar, P.T., Cartwright, P.G. & S~hloss, C.N. (1987-88). The influence of error correction pro~edures and . ted

question type on student achievement in comp ter-assis , instruction. Journal of Educational Technolo;y Systems 16 (1),17-27.

Search, P. (1993). HyperGlyphs: using design and ~anguage to define hypermedia navigation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2 (4), 36940.

Seligman, M.E. (1990). Learned optimism New Y~rk: Knopf. Maier, S.F. & Geer, J.H. (1968). Alleviation! of learned helplessness in the dog. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 73,256-62.

Siegel, M.A. & Misselt, A.L. (1984). Adaptive feedback and review paradigm for computer-based drills. Journal of Educational Psychology 76, 310-17.

Skinner, B.F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science 1~8, 969-77.

- (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.

Smith, P.L. & Ragan, T.J. (1993). Designing instructional feedback for different learning outcomes. In J.~. Dempsey & G.C. Sales, eds. Interactive instruction and feedback, 75-103. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J. & Coulson, R.L. (199 1 a). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, an4 hypertext: random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational technology, May 1991, 24-33.

--, --, -- & -- (1991b) Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in: situationspecific knowledge assembly: Some constructiv ~st issues as they relate to cognitive flexibility theory and! hypertext. Educational Technology, Sep. 1991, 22-25.

Sturges, P.T. (1969). Verbal retention as a function Of the informativeness and delay of information feedback. ;Journal of Educational Psychology 60, 11-14.

- (1972). Information delay and retention: effect of ~nformation in feedback and tests. Journal of Educational Psychology 63,32-43.

Surber, J.R. & Anderson, R.C. (1975). Delay-reteriltion effect in natural classroom settings. Journal of Educational Psychology 67 (2), 170-73.

Swindell, L. (1991, Apr.). Testing a model offeedback in written instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Swindell, L.K. (1992). Certitude and the constrained processing of feedback. Contemporary Educational Ps;chology 17,30-37.

Kulhavy, R.W. & Stock, W.A. (1992). The role of response confidence in comprehension and memory for written instruction. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Peterson, S.E. & Greenway, R. (1992). Children's use of response confidence in the processing of instructional feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology 37945.

Tait, K., Hartley, J.R. & Anderson, R.C. (1973).: Feedback procedures in computer-assisted arithmetic instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 43, 101-7 1.

Tennyson, R.D. & Cocchiarella, M.J. (1986). An Ompirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts. Review ofEducational Research 56 (1),40-71.

& Park, O.C. (1980). The teaching of concepts: a review of instructional design research literature. Review ofEducational Research 50 (1), 55-70.

Tessiner, M., Wilson, B. & Driscoll, M. (1990). A new model of concept teaching and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 38 (1), 45-53.

Tosti, D.T. (1978). Formative feedback. NSP[Journal 13,19-21.

Travers, R.M., van Wagenen, R.K., Haygood, D.H. & McCormick, M. (1964). Learning as a consequence of the learner's task involvement under different conditions of feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology 55 (3), 167-73.

Tucker, S.A. (1993). Evaluation as feedback in instructional technology: the role of feedback in program evaluation. In J.V, Dempsey & G.C. Sales, eds. Interactive instruction andjeedback, 301-42. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Vance, R.J. & Coella, A. (1990). Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (1), 68-76.

Wager, S.U. (1983). The effect of immediacy and type of informative feedback on retention in a computer-assisted task. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1983.) Dissertation Abstracts International 44, 2 100A.

Wager, W. & Wager, S. (1985). Presenting questions, processing responses, and providing feedback in CAI. Journal of Instructional Development 8 (4), 2-8.

Waldrop, RB., Justen, J.E. & Adams, T.M. (1986). A comparison of three types of feedback in a computer-assisted instruction task. Educational Technology 26, 43-45.

Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language, 2d ed. (1984). New York: Simon & Schuster.

Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of motivation:,from mechanism to cognition. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

- (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology 71, 3-25.

- (1980). Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Arinston.

Wentling, T.L. (1973). Mastery versus nomnastery instruction with varying test item feedback treatments. Journal of Educational Psychology 65 (1), 50-5811

Wilson, B. (1986). What is a concept.? Cognitive teaching and cognitive psychology. Performance and Instruction 25 (10),16-18.

Winne, PH. (1989). Theories of instruction and intelligence for designing artificially intelligentj tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist 24, 229-59.

- (1992). State-of-the-art instructional computing systems that afford instruction and bootstrap research. In M. Jones & PH. Winne, eds. Foundations andj~ontiers of adaptive learning environments, 349-80. Berlin: Springer.

Young, M.F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research Development 41 (1),43-58.

Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globersop, T. & Givon, H. (1991). Enhancing writing-related met4cognitions through a computerized writing partner. American Educational Research Journal 28, 373-39.

Ziminerman, B.J. (1989). A social-cognItive view of selfregulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 81,329-39.

ed. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement [special issue]. Educational Psychologist 25 (1).

& Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of ~ learning. In D.H. Schunk & J.L. Meece, eds. Student Perceptions in the classroom, 185-207. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlb aum.