28 - References

Adelson, L. (1975). Comprehension by college students of time compressed lectures. Journal of Experimental Education 44, 53-59.

Agency for International Development (n.d.). Interactive radio instruction. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.

Aikens, H.F. & Ross, A.J. (1977). Immediate, repetitive playback/record - a practical solution. NAALD Journal 11 (2), 40-46.

Allen, E.D. (1960). The effects of the language laboratory on the development of skill in a foreign language. Modern Language Journal 44, 355-58.

Allen, W.H. (1959). Research on new educational media: summary and problems. Audio-Visual Communication Review 7,83-96.

— (1971). Instructional Media research: past, present, and future. Audio-Visual Communication Review 19, 5-18.

Altamura, N.C. (1970). Laboratory a liability. French Review 43,819-20.

Anderson, E.W. (1964). Review and criticism. Modern Language Journal 48, 197-206.

Bagster-Collins, E.W., et at. (1930). Studies in Modern Language teaching. New York: Macmillan.

Barrutia, R. (1967). The past, present, and future of language laboratories. Hispania 50, 888-99.

Bates, A.W. (1983). Adult teaming from educational television: the open university experience. In M.J.A. Howe, ed. Learning from television: psychological and educational research, 213-27. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bauer, EX (1964). A study of the effectiveness of two language laboratory conditions in the teaching of second year German. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2, 99-112.

Bell, R. (1969). An analysis of certain elements of an audio-take approach to instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Benathy, B.H. & Jordan, B. (1969). A classroom laboratory instructional system (CLIS). Foreign Language Annals 2, 466-73.

Benz, C.R. (1971). Effects of time compressed speech upon the comprehension of a visual oriented television lecture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.

Boyle, V.A. (1969). Visual stimulation and comprehension of compressed speech. (Doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers, 1969). Dissertation Abstracts International, 30,5221B.

Breed, P.A. (1977). The relative effect of the controlled reader and the speech compressor on reading rate and comprehension. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northern Illinois University.

Brushwood, J. & Polmantier, P. (1953). The effectiveness of the audio-laboratory in elementary Modern Language courses. Columbia, MO: The, University of Missouri.

Buchanan, M.A. & MacPhee, E.D. (1928). An annotated bibliography of Modern Language methodology. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

Buka, M., Freeman, M.K. & Locke, W.N. (1962). Language teaming and frequency response. International Journal of American Linguistics 28, 62-79.

Button, G.E. (1991). Audio-tutorial biology, andragogy, and self-esteem: relationships among independent and dependent variables. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53/02, 457. (University Microfilms No. AAC 9211068.)

Carroll, J.B. (1963). Research on teaching foreign languages. In N.L. Gage, ed. Handbook of research on teaching, 1060-1100. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

— (1969a). Modern Languages. In R.L. Ebel, ed. Encyclopaedia of educational research, 4th ed., 866-78. New York: Macmillan.

— (1969b). What does the Pennsylvania foreign language research project tell us? Foreign Language Annals 3, 214-36.

Carter, K.R. & Cooney, J.B. (1983). The audio-tutorial applied in psychology classes to minimize individual differences and save class time. Teaching of Psychology 10, 201-04.

Carver, R.P. (1973). Understanding, information processing, and teaming from prose materials. Journal of Educational Psychology 64, 76-84.

— (1982). Optimal rate of reading prose. Reading Research Quarterly 18 (1), 56-88.

— (1973). Effect of increasing the rate of speech presentation upon comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 65,118-26.

Chomei, T. & Houlihan, R. (1970). Comparative effectiveness of three language lab methods using a new equipment system. AV Communication Review 18, 160-68.

Chall, J.S. & Dial, H.E. (1948). Predicting listener understanding and interest in newscasts. Educational Research Bulletin 27,141-53.

Cicardo, A.R. (1974 ). An analysis of retention of a compressed speech message among various intelligence levels, rates of compression, and retention levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern State University of Louisiana.

Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research 53, 445-59.

Clarke, C.C. (1918). The phonograph in Modern Language teaching. Modern Language Journal 3, 116-22.

Claudel, C.A. (1968). The language laboratory. In J.S. Roucek, ed. The study of foreign languages, 219-36. New York: Philosophical Library.

Constantine, M. (1964). Radio in the elementary school. Science Education 48, 121-32.

Cook, D.C. & Nemzek, C. (1939). Effectiveness of teaching by radio. The Journal of Educational Research 33 (2), 105-09.

Cook, H.R. (1964). The effects of learning of structural drills in Spanish broadcast via high frequency AM radio (NDEA Title VII Project No. 1018). Bloomington, IN. Indiana University.

Cutler, R.L., McKeachie, W.J. & McNeil, E.B. (1958). Teaching psychology by telephone. The American Psychologist 13 (9), 551-52.

Davies, N.F. (1982). Foreign/second language education and technology in the future. NAALD Journal 16 (3/4), 5-14.

Davison, W.F. (1973). The language laboratory: a bibliography, 1950-1972. Pittsburgh, PA: University Center for International Studies and The English Language Institute, University of Pittsburgh.

Derthick, L.G. (1959). The purpose and legislative history of the foreign language titles in the National Defense Education Act, 1958. Publications of the Modern Language Association 74, 48-51.

Diekhoff, J.S. (1965). NDEA and modern foreign languages. New York: Modern Language Association.

DeKieffer, R.E. (1973). The national center for audio tapes. In J.W. Brown, ed. Educational Media Yearbook, 56-59. New York: Bowker.

DeWick, H.N. (1935, Jun.). The relative recall effectiveness of visual and auditory presentation of advertising material. The Journal of Applied Psychology 19, 245--64.

Diehl, C.F., White, R.D. & Burke, K. (1959). Rate and comprehension. Speech Monographs 26, 229-32.

Dodge, J.W. (1968). Language laboratories. In E.M. Birkmaier, ed. Britannica review of foreign language education, Vol. 1, 331-35. Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Driscoll, J. (1981). Research trends in rate-controlled speech for language learning. NALLD Journal 15 (2), 45-51.

Duker, S. (1974). Time compressed speech. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.

Eckhardt, WX (1970). Learning in multi-media programmed instruction as a function of aptitude and instruction rate controlled by compressed speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

Eddy, F.D. (1944). The language studio. Modern Language Joumal 28,338-41.

Ek, J.D. (1974). Grant fever. NALLD Journal 9 (1), 17-23.

Ely, P. (1984). Bring the lab back to life. Oxford, England: Pergamon.

Erickson, C.I. & King, 1. (1917). A comparison of visual and oral presentations of lessons in die case of pupils from third to ninth grade, School and Society 6 (136), 146-48.

Eshgh, R., Hoxeng, J., Provenzano, J. & Casals, B., eds. (1988). Radio-assisted community basic education (RADECO). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

Fairbanks, G., Everitt, W.L. & Jaeger, R.P. (1954). Method for time or frequency compression-expansion of speech. Transactions of the Institute of Radio Engineers, Professional Groups on Audio, AU 2, 7-12.

—, Guttman, N. & Miron, M.S. (1957). Auditory comprehension of repeated high speech messages. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 22, 23-32,

Fergen, G.K. (1954). Listening comprehension at controlled rates for children in grades iv, v, and vi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri.

Fotos, J.T. (1955). The Purdue laboratory method in teaching beginning French classes. Modern Language Journal 39, 141-43.

Foulke, E. (1968). Listening comprehension as a function of word rate. Journal of Communication 18, 198-206.

—, ed. (1966). Proceedings of the Louisville conference on time-compressed speech. Louisville, KY. Center for Rate Controlled Recordings.

—, Amster, C.H., Bixler, R.H. & Nolan, CX (1962). The comprehension of rapid speech by the blind. Exceptional Children 11, 134-41.

Foulke, E.A. & Sticht, T.G. (1967). The intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech. Proceedings of the Louisville Conference on Time Compressed Speech, Louisville, KY, 21-28.

— (1969). Proceedings of the second Louisville conference on rate and/or frequency controlled speech. Louisville, KY. University of Louisville. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 61682.)

— (1962, Mar.). A comparison of two methods of compressing speech. Symposium at the Southeastern Psychological Association, Louisville, KY.

— & Sticht, T.G. (1969). A review of research on the intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech. Psychological Bulletin 72, 50-62.

Fox, B. & Roblin, J.S. (1952). Retention and sleep. Journall of Experimental Psychology 43 (1), 75-79.

Freeman, MZ & Buka, M. (1965). Effect of frequency response on language learning. AV Communication Review 13, 289-95.

Friedman, H.L., Freedle, R.O., Norris, C.M. & Orr, D.B. (1966). Further research on speeded speech as an educational medium. (Report No. AIR-E-50-7-66-TR-3.) Silver Spring, MD: American Institute for Research in the Behavioral Sciences (ED 044 903).

—, Orr, D. & Norris, C. (1966). Further research on speeded speech as an educational medium-the use of listening aids. (Report No. 3.) Silver Spring, MD: American Institutes for Research in Behavioral Sciences (ED 044 903).

Funke, E. (1949). Rebuilding a practical phonetics laboratory. German Quarterly 21, 120-25.

Fumham, A. & Gunter, B. (1985). Sex, presentation mode and memory for violent and non-violent news. Journal of Educational Television 11, 99-105.

— & Gunter, B. (1987). Effects of time of day and medium of presentation on recall of violent and non-violent news. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1, 255-62.

— , Benson, 1. & Gunter, B. (1987). Memory for television commercials as a function of the channel of communication. Social Behaviour 2, 105-12.

— , & Gunter, B. & Green, A. (1988). Remembering science: the recall of factual information as a function of presentation mode. Applied Cognitive Psychology 4, 203-12.

— , Proctor, T. & Gunter, B. (1988). Memory for material presented in the media: the superiority of written communication. Psychological Reports 63, 935-38.

Gallacher, I & Stevens, R. (1954). Teaching with a tape recorder. California Joumal of Secondary Education 29, 312-14.

Garvey, W.D. (1953). The intelligibility of speeded speech. Joumal of Experimental Psychology 45, 102-08.

George, R.G. (1970). Retention of prose material as a function of rate of presentation and difficulty of material. Audio Visual Communication Review 18, 291-99.

Gibson, R. (1958). Tape recordings are used to teach seventhgrade students in Westside Junior-Senior High School, Omaha, NE. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary Principals 42, 81-93.

— (1959).'Ihe tape recordings experiment is expanded in Westside Junior-Senior High School, Omaha, NE. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary Principals 43, 49-72.

— (1960). Final report on the Westside High School Teachingby-Tape Project. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary Principals 44, 56-62.

Godfrey, E.P. (1967). The state of audiovisual technology: 1961-1966. Washington DC: Department of Audiovisual Instruction, National Education Association.

Goldhaber, G. (1967). Listener comprehension of compressed speech when the difficulty level of the content and the sex of the listener varied. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Maryland.

— (1970). Listener comprehension of compressed speech as a function of the academic grade level of the subjects. The Joumal of Communications 20, 167-73.

Goldstein, H. (1940). Reading and listening comprehension at various controlled rates. Teacher College Contributions to Education, No. 821.

Green, J.R. (1965). Language laboratory research: a critique. Modern Language Joumal 49, 367-69.

Grittner, F. (1964). The shortcomings of language laboratory findings in the IAR-Research Bulletin. Modern Language Joumal 48, 207-10.

Gullette, C.C. (1932). Ear training in the teaching of pronunciation. Modern Language Journal 16, 334-36.

Gunter, B. (1987). Poor reception: misunderstanding and forgetting broadcast news. Hillsdale, NJ:

Erlbaum. & Fumham, A. (1986). Sex and personality differences in recall of violent and non-violent news from three presentational modalities. Personality and Individual Differences 7, 829-37.

- & Gietson, G. (1984). Memory for the news as function of the channel of communication. Human Learning 3, 265-71.

- & Leese, J. (1986). Memory for information from a party political broadcast as a function of channel of communication. Social Behaviour 1, 135-42.

Hartman, F.R. (1961). Single and multiple communication: a review of research and proposed model. Audio Visual Communication Review 9, 235-62.

Harvey, T.E. (1978). The matter with listening comprehension isn't the ear: hardware & software. NALLD Journal 13 (1), 8-16.

Hayes, A.S. (1963). Language laboratory facilities: technical guide for the selection, purchase, use, and maintenance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Heinich, R. (1968). The teacher in an instructional system. In F.G. Knirk & J.W. Childs, eds. Instructional technology: a book of readings, 45-60. New York: Holt.

Hirsch, R. (1954). Audio-visual aids in language teaching. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Hocking, E. (1964). Language laboratory and language leaming. Washington, DC: Division of Audiovisual Instruction, National Education Association.

Holmes, G. (1985). From the president. NALLD Journal 19 (2),5-7.

Huppert, J. & Lazarowitz, R. (1990). Pupils abilities and academic achievement in an individualized biology curriculum. Research in Science and Technological Education 8, 117-3 1.

Hutchison, J.C. (1961). modern foreign languages in high school. the language laboratory. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Jarlett, F.G. (1971). The falsely accused language laboratory: 25 years of misuse. NALLD Joumal 5 (4), 27-34.

Johnston, M.C. & Seerley, C.C. (1960). Foreign language laboratories. in schools and colleges. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Klavon, A.J. (1975). Time-compressed lecture: an alternative for increased teacher learner interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.

Keating, L.C. (1936). modern inventions in the language program. School and Society 44, 677-79.

Keating, R.F. (1963). A study of the effectiveness of language laboratories. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Kelly, L.G. (1969). 25 centuries of language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury.

Kenner, R. (1981). Report on the Concordia Colloquium on language laboratories. NALLD Joumal 16 (2), 15-18.

Koekkoek, B.J. (1959). The advent of the language laboratory. Modern Language Journal 43, 4-5.

Kramer, E.J. & Lewis, T.R. (1951). Comparison of visual and non-visual listening. Joumal of Communication 1 (2), 16-20.

Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.-L.C. & Cohen, P.A. (1979). Research on audio-tutorial instruction: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Review of Educational Research 11, 321-41.

Lange, D.L. (1968). Methods. In E.M. Birkmaier, ed. Britannica Review ofForeign Language Education, Vol. 1, 281-3 10. Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Larsen, R.P. & Feder, D.D. (1940). Common and differential factors in reading and hearing comprehension. The Joumal of Educational Psychology 31, 241-5 1.

Leshan, L. (1942). The breaking of a habit by suggestion during steep. The Journal ofAbnormal and Social Psychology 37, 406-08.

Last, R.W. (1989). Artificial intelligence techniques in language learning. Chichester, England: Horwood.

LeMon, R.E. (1986). Computer labs and language labs: lessons to be learned. Educational Technology 26, 46-47.

Leon, P.R. (1962). Laboratoire de langues et correction phonitique. Paris: Didier.

Levin, L.M. (1931). More anent the phonetic laboratory method. Modern Language Journal 15, 427-3 1.

Lorge, S.W. (1964). Language laboratory research studies in New York City high schools: a discussion of the program and the findings. Modern Language Journal 48, 409-19.

— (1965). Comments on "language laboratory research: a critique." Modern Language Journal 49, 369-70.

Loder, LE. (1937). A study of aural learning with and without the speaker present. Journal of Experimental Education 6, 46-60.

Ludrick, LA. (1974). A-study of the effects of controlled delivery instruction upon the achievement of college students using compressed speech audio and television pictorials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Oklahoma.

Lysaght, C.E. (1969). Geriatrics: effect of speech rate and pacing procedures upon the responses to verbal stimuli by three age groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.

Maclachlan, J. (1982). Listener perception of time-compressed spokespersons for radio commercials. Journal of Advertising 22, 47-51.

May, M.A. & Lumsdaine, A.A. (1958). Learning from films.. New Haven, CT. Yale.

McCoy, I.H. & Weible, D.M. (1983). Foreign languages and the new media: the videodisc and the microcomputer. In CJ. James, ed. Practical applications of research in foreign language teaching, 105-52. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.

Meierhenry, W.C. (1962). Needed research in the introduction and use of audiovisual materials: a special report. AudioVisual Communication Review 10, 307-16.

Miller, G.A. & Lichlinder, J.C. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22, 167-73.

Molstad, J. (1955). Readability formulas and film grade-placement. Audio-Visual Communication Review 3, 99-108.

Mosenthal, P. (1976-77). Psycholinguistic properties of aural and visual comprehension as determined by children's abilities to comprehend syllogisms. Reading Research Quarterly 12, 55-92.

Mueller, T. & Borglum, G. (1956). Language laboratory and target language. French Review 29, 322-3 1.

Menne, J.W., Klingenschmidt, LE: & Nord, D.L. (1969, Mar.). The feasibility of using taped lectures to replace class attendance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles.

Nasser, D.L. & McEwen, W.J. (1976). The impact of alternate media channels: recall and involvement with messages. AV Communication Review 24, 263-72.

Nelson, H.E. (1948). The effect of variations of rates on the recall by radio listeners of straight newscast. Speech Monographs 1, 173-80.

Newmark, M. (1948). Teaching materials: textbooks, audiovisual aids, the language laboratory. In M. Newmark, ed. Twentieth century Modern Language teaching, 456-62. New York: Philosophical Library.

Nichols, R.G. & Stevens, L.A. (1957). Are you listening? New York: McGraw-ffill.

Novak, J.D. & Musunda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal 28, 117-53.

Nugent, G.C. (1982). Pictures, audio, and print: symbolic representation and effect on learning. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 30, 163-74.

NHK Radio-Television Cultural Research Institute (1956). The listening effect of radio English classroom. Tokyo: NHK.

Otto, S. (1989). The language laboratory in the computer age. In W.F. Smith, ed. modern technology in foreign language education: applications and projects, 13-41. Chicago, IL: National Textbook.

Parker, W.R. (1960). Foreword. In EJ. Oinas, ed. Language teaching today, pp. v-viii. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.

— (1961). The national interest and foreign languages, 3d ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.

Pederson, K.M. (1987). Research on CALL. In W.F. Smith, ed. Modern media in foreign language education: theory and implementation, 99-131. Chicago, IL: National Textbook.

Peebles, S. (1938). 7he phonetics laboratory and its usefulness. Unpublished MA thesis. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.

Peterson, P. (1974). Origins of the language laboratory. NALLD Journal 8 (4), 5-17.

Olsen, D.R. & Bruner, J.S. (1974). Learning through experience and learning through media. In D.R. Olsen, ed. Media and symbols, 125-50. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Orr, D.B. & Friedman, H.L. (1964). Research on speeded speech as an educational medium. (Progress Report, Grant No. 7-48-7670-203.) U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Washington, DC.

- & Williams, J.C. (1965). Trainability of listening comprehension of speeded discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology 56, 148-56.

Popham, W.J. (1962). Tape recorded lectures in the college classroom 11. AV Communication Review 10, 94-101.

Porter, JJ. & Porter, S.F. (1964). A critique of the Keating report. Modern Language Journal 48, 195-97.

Racle, G.L. (1976). Laboratoire de la2ngues: probl~mes et orientations. Canadian Modern Language Review 32, 384-88.

Postlethwaite, S.N. (1970). The audio-tutorial system. American Biology Teacher 32, 31-33.

- (1972). The audio-tutorial system: incorporating mini course and mastery. Educational Technology 12 (9), 35-37.

— (1975). Students are a lot like people! American Biology Teacher 37, 205.

— (1978). Principles behind the audio-tutorial system. NSPI Journal 17, 3-4,18.

— (1980). Improvement of science teaching. BioScience 30, 601-.04.

Novak, L & Murray, H.T., Jr. (1972). The audio-tutorial approach to learning, 3d ed. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.

Potter, M.C. (1990). Remembering. In D.N. Osherson & E.E. Smith, eds. Thinking: an invitation to cognitive science, 3-32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rao, PX (1977). Telephone and instructional communication. In I.D.S. Pool, ed. The social impact of the telephone, 473-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Reid, R.H. (1968). Comprehension of compressed speech as a function of difficulty of material. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.

Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (1992). Second language teaching and learning. In M.C. Aikin, ed. Encyclopaedia of educational research, 6th ed., 1200-08. New York: Macmillan.

Robertson, E.M. (1977). The effects of different rates of recorded speech on the listening comprehension of adult remedial readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.

Rohwer, W.D. & Harris, W.J. (1975). Media effect on prose learning in two populations of children. Journal of Educational Psychology 67, 651-57.

Ross, R.A. (1964). Look at listeners. Elementary School Journal 64 (7), 369-72.

Rossiter, C.M., Jr. (1972). Sex of the speaker, sex of the listener, and listening comprehension. The Journal of Communication 22, 64-69.

(1970). The effects of rate of presentation on listening test scores for recall of facts, recall of ideas, and generation of inferences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University.

Rulon, PX (1943a) A comparison of phonographic recordings with printed material in terms of knowledge, The Harvard Educational Review 8, 63-76.

— (1943b). A comparison of phonographic recordings with printed material in terms of knowledge gained through their use in a teaching unit, The Harvard Educational Review 8, 163-75.

— (1943c). A comparison of phonographic recordings with printed motivation to further study. The Harvard Educational Review 8, 246-55.

Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

— (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": the differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology 76, 647-58.

Sanchez, J. (1959). Twenty years of Modern Language laboratory (an annotated bibliography). Modern Language Journal 43, 228-32.

Schenk, E.H. (1930). Practical difficulties in the use of the phonetics laboratory. Modern Language Journal 15, 30-32.

Scherer, G.A.C. & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign-language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schramm, W. (1972). What the research says. In W. Schramm, ed. Quality instructional television, 44--79. Honolulu: HI: University Press of Hawaii.

Scott, R.J. (1965). Temporal effects in speech analysis and synthesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

Short, H.S. (1977). A comparison of variable time-compressed speech and normal rate speech based on time spent and perf0rinance in a course taught by self-instructional methods. British Journal of Educational Technology 8, 146-57.

Sisson, C.R. (1970). The effect of delayed comparison in the language laboratory on phoneme discrimination and pronunciation accuracy. Language Learning 20, 69-88.

Smith, P.D. (1969a). The Pennsylvania foreign language research project: teacher proficiency and class achievement in two Modern Languages. Foreign Language Annals 3, 194-207.

— (1969b). An assessment of three foreign language teaching strategies and three language laboratory systems. The French Review 43, 289-304.

— (1980). A study of the effect of "slowed speech"' on listening comprehension of French. NALLD Journal 14 (3/4), 9-13.

Smith, W.F. (1970). Language learning laboratory. In D.L. Lange, ed. Britannica review offoreign language education, Vol. 2, 191-237. Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

— (1987). modern media inforeign language education: theory and implementation. Chicago, IL: National Textbook.

— (1989). modern technology inforeign language education: applications and projects. Chicago, EL: National Textbook.

Stack, E.M. (1964). The Keating report: a symposium. Modern Language Journal 48, 189-210.

— (1971). The language laboratory and Modern Language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stanton, F.N. (1934). Memory for advertising copy presented visually and orally, The Journal of Applied Psychology 18, 45-64.

Stich, T.G. (1968). Some relationships of mental aptitude, reading ability, and listening ability using normal and time-compressed speech. Journal of Communication 18, 243-58.

- & Glasnap, D.R. (1972). Effects of speech rate, selection difficulty, association strength, and mental aptitude on learning by listening. The Journal of Communication 22, 174-88.

— (197 1). Failure to increase learning using the time saved by the time compression of speech. Journal of Educational Psychology 62, 55-59.

Stiefel, W.A. (1952). Bricks with straw-the language laboratory. Modern Language Journal 36,68-73.

Strei, G. (1977). Reviving the language lab. TESOL Newsletter 11, 10.

Svoboda, R.G. (1978). Audio-tutorial courses for college algebra and trigonometry: a progress report. Fort Wayne, IN: Indiana University. (ED 167125.)

Taylor, S.E. (1965). Eye movements in reading: facts and fallacies. American Educational Research Journal 2, 187-202.

Tripp, S.D. (1994, Aug. 5). Do media affect memory? Paper presented at the 3d Practical Aspects of Memory Conference, College Park, MD.

Valette, R.M. (1969). The Pennsylvania project, its conclusions and its implications. Modern Language Journal 53, 396-404.

Voor, J.B. & Miller, J.M. (1965). The effect of practice on the comprehension of time compressed speech. Speech Monographs 32, 452-54.

Waltz, R.H. (1930). The laboratory as an aid to Modern Language teaching. Modern Language Journal 15, 27-29.

— (1931). Language laboratory administration. Modern Language Journal 16, 217-27.

— (1932). Some results of laboratory training. Modern Language Journal 16, 299-305.

Wasserman, H.M. & Tedford, W.H. (1973). Recall of temporally compressed auditory and visual information. Psychological Reports 32, 499-502.

Watts, M.W. Jr. (1971). Differences in educational level and subject matter difficulty in the use of compressed speech with adult military students. Adult Educational Journal 21, 27-36.

Whitehouse, R.S. (1945). The workshop: a language laboratory. Hispania 28, 88-90.

Williams, D.L., Moore, D. M., & Sewell, E.H., Jr. (1983-84). Effects of compressed speech on comprehension of community college students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 12, 273-84.

Wolcott, L.L. (1993). Audio tools for distance education. In B. Willis, ed. Distance education: strategies and tools, 135--64, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wood, C.D. (1966). Comprehension of compressed speech by elementary school children. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana (ED 003 216.)

Worchester, D.A. (Jan., 1925). Memory by visual and auditory presentation. The Journal of Educational Psychology 16 (1),18-27.

Young, W.E. (1936). The relation of reading comprehension and retention to hearing comprehension and retention. Journal of Experimental Education 5 (1), 30-39.

Young, C.W. & Choquette, C.A. (1965). An experimental study of the effectiveness of four systems of equipment for self-monitoring in teaching French pronunciation. International Review ofApplied Linguistics 3, 13-49.