26 - References

Alesandrini, K.L. (1984). Pictures and adult learning. Instructional Science 13, 63-77.

Anderson, J.R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review 85, 249-77.

Amheftn, R. (1954). Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

- (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of Califomia Press.

- (1974). Virtues and vices of the visual media. In D.R. Olsen, ed. Media and symbols: the forms of expression, communication, and education. The 73d Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 180-210. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

- (1986). New essays on the psychology of art. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Biederman, 1. (1985). Human image understanding: recent research and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 32, 29-73.

(1987). Recognition by components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94, 115-47.

Blinder, D. (1983). The controversy over conventionalism. Journal ofAesthetics and Art Criticism 41253-64.

Brody, P.J. (1984). In search of instructional utility: a functionbased approach to pictorial research. Instructional Science 13,47-61.

Bruner, J.S. & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: a paradigm. Journal of Personality 18, 206-23.

Caraballo-Rios, A.L. (1985). An experimental study to investigate the effects of computer animation on the understanding and retention of selected levels of learning outcomes. (Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 1985.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 1494A.

Carrier, D. (1983). Goinbrich on art historical explanations. Leonardo 16, 91-96.

Cassidy, M.E (1982). Toward integration: education, instructional technology, and serniotics. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 30, 75-89.

Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man. New Haven, CT- Yale University Press.

Coldron, J. (1982). Peltz on Goodman on exemplification. Journal ofAesthetic Education 16, 88-93.

Concannon, S.J. (1975). Illustrations in books for children: review of research. The Reading Teacher 29, 254-56.

Connell, J.H. & Brady, M. (1987). Generating and generalizing models of visual objects. Artificial Intelligence 31, 159-83.

Crozier, W.R. & Chapman, A.J., eds. (1984). Cognitive processes in the perception of art. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Cutting, I.E. (1982). Two ecological perspectives: Gibson vs. Shaw and Turvey. American Journal of Psychology 95 (2), 199-222.

- (1987). Perception and information. Annual Review of Psychology 38, 61-90.

Duchastel, P.C. & Waller, R. (1979, Nov.). Pictorial illustration in instructional texts. Educational Technology, 20-25.

- (1978). Illustrating instructional texts. Educational Technology 11, 36-39.

Dwyer, F.M. (1972). A guidefor improving visualized instruction. State College, PA: Learning Services.

(1978). Strategiesfor improving visual learning. State College, PA: Learning Services.

ed. (1987). Enhancing visualized instruction-recommendationsfor practitioners. State College, PA: Learning Services.

Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Elgin, C.Z. (1984). Representation, comprehension, and competence. Social Research 51 (4), 905-25.

Feaver, W. (1977). When we were young: two centuries of children ~ book illustration. London, England.: Thames & Hudson.

Fischler, M. & Firschein, 0., eds. (1987). Readings in computer vision: issues, problems, principles, andparadigms. Palo Alto, CA: Kaufmann.

Fleining, M. (1967). Classification and analysis of instructional illustrations. AV Communication Review 15 (3), 246-58. (1993). Introduction. In M. Fleming & W.H. Levie, eds. Instructional message design: principles firom the behavioral and cognitive sciences, p. x. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

Fodor, J.H. & Pylyshyn, Z.W. (198 1). How direct is visual perception? Some reflections on Gibson's "ecological approach." Cognition 9, 139-96.

Freeman, EN., ed. (1924). Visual education: a comparative study of motion pictures a'nd other methods of instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain: a cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.

Howard, V.A. & Perkins, D. (1974). Symbol systems: a philosophical, psychological, and educational investigation. In D.R. Olson, ed. Media and symbols: theforms of expression, communication, and education. 73d Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 27-55. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Gibson, J.J. (1971). The information available in pictures. Leonardo 4, 27-35.

- (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception.

Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

- & Bridgeman, B. (1987). The visual perception of surface texture in photographs. Psychological Review 49, 1-5.

Goldstein, E.B. (1987). Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at

an angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13 (2), 256-66.

Gombrich, E.H. (1969). Art and illusion: a study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

(1972). The visual image. Scientific American 227 (3), 82-96. Goodman, N., ed. (1976). Languages of art: an approach to a theory of symbols, 2d ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hacket.

Greene, R. (1983). Determining the preferred viewpoint in linear perspective. Leonardo 16, 97-102.

Gregory, R.L. (1970). The intelligent eye. New York: McGraw-Hill.

- (1973). Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill.

- (198 1). Questions of pattern and object perception by man and computer. In J. Long & A. Baddeley, eds. Attention and performance IX, pp. 97-116. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Haber, R.N. (1979). Perceiving the layout of space in pictures: a perspective theory based upon Leonardo da Vinci. In C.F. Nodine & D.F. Fisher, eds. Perception andpictorial representation, 84-99. New York: Praeger.

Hagen, M.A. (1978). An outline of an investigation into the special character of pictures. In H.L.J. Pick & E. Saltzman, eds. Modes of perceiving and processing information, 23-38. New York: Wiley.

(1980a). Generative theory: a perceptual theory of pictorial representation. In M.A. Hagen, ed. The perception of pictures, Vol. 2, 3-46. New York: Academic.

ed. (1980b). The perception of pictures, Vol. 1, Alberti:y window: the projective model ofpictorial information. New York: Academic.

ed. (1980c). The perception of pictures, Vol. 2, Durer~ devices: beyond the projective model of pictures. New York: Academic.

(1986). Varieties of realism: geometries of representational art. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Heffernan, J.A. (1985). Resemblance, signification, and metaphor in the visual arts. Journal of Aesthetics and Arts Criticism 44 (2), 167-80.

Hochberg, J. (1972). The representation of things and people. In E.H. Gombrich, J. Hochberg & M. Black, eds. All, perception, and reality, 47-94. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

- (1979). Some of the things that paintings are. In C.F. Nodine & D.F. Fisher, eds. Perception and pictorial representation, 17-4 1. New York: Praeger. .

- (1980). Pictorial functions and perceptual structures. In M.A. Hagen, ed. The perception of pictures, Vol. 2, 47-93. New York: Academic.

Hoffman, W.C. & Dodwell, P.C. (1985). Geometric psychology generates the visual Gestalt. Canadian Journal of Psychology 39, 491-528.

Holliday, W.G. (1973). Critical analysis of pictorial research related to science education. Science Education 57 (2), 201-14.

Holowka, T. (1981). On conventionality of signs. Semiotica 33,79-86.

Jackendoff, R. (1987). On beyond zebra: the relation of linguistic and visual information. Cognition 26, 89-114.

Katz, S. (1983). R.L. Gregory et al.: The wrong picture of the picture theory of perception. Perception 12, 269-79.

Kennedy, J.M. (1974). A psychology ofpicture perception. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

(1984a). Goinbrich and Winner: schema theories of perception in aesthetics. Visual Arts Research 10 (2), 30-36.

- (1984b). How minds use pictures. Social Research 51 (4), 885-904.

- (1985). Arnheim, Gestalt theory and pictures. Visual Arts Research 11, 23-44.

Kieras, D. (1978). Beyond pictures and words: alternative information processing models for imagery effects in verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin 85, 532-54.

Kitcher, P. (1988). Marrs's computational theory of vision. Philosophy of Science 55, 1-24.

Knowlton, J.Q. (1964). A socio- and psycho-linguistic theory of pictorial communication. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. (1966). On the definition of "picture." AV Communication Review 14, 157-83.

Kolers, P.A. (1983). Perception and representation. Annual Review of Psychology 34, 129-66.

& Smythe, W.E. (1984). Symbol manipulation: alternatives to the computational view of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, 289-314.

Kosslyn, S.M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

--(198 1). The medium and the message in mental imagery: a theory. Psychological Review 88, 46-66.

- (1986). Toward a computational neuropsychology of highlevel vision. In T.J. Knapp & L.C. Robertson, eds. Approaches to cognition: contrasts and controversies, 223-42. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

- (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. Psychological Review 94 (2), 148-75.

Kubovy, M. (1986). The psychology of perspective and Renaissance art. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Langer, S. (1976). Philosophy in a new key, 3d ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Levie, W.H. (1978). A prospectus for instructional research on visual literacy. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 26, 25-36.

- (1987). Research on pictures: a guide to the literature. In D.M. Willows & H.A. Houghton, eds. The psychology o illustration: Vol. 1: Basic research, 1-50. New York: Springer.

- & Dickie, K.E. (1973). The analysis and application of media. In R.M.W. Travers, a Second handbook of research on teaching, 858-82. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

- & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: a review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 30 (4), 195-232.

Levin, J.R. (1981). On the functions of pictures in prose. In FJ. Pirozzolo & M.C. Wittrock, eds. Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading, 203-28. New York: Academic.

- Anglin, G.J. & Carney, R.N. (1987). On empirically vali dating functions of pictures in prose. In D.M. Willows & H.A. Houghton, eds. The Psychology of illustration, 51-80. New York: Springer.

- & Lesgold, A.M. (1978). On pictures in prose. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 26, 233-43.

Lowe, D.G. (1987). Three-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images. Artificial Intelligence 31,355-95.

Lurnsdaine, A.A., Sultzer, R.L. & Kopstein, EF (1961). The effect of animation cues and repetition of examples on learning from an instructional film. In A.A. Lumsdaine, edStudent response in programmed instruction, 241-69. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation andprocessing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

May, M.A. & Lumsdaine, A.A. (1958). Learning from films. New Haven, CT. Yale University Press.

Mitchell, W.J.T., ed. (1980). The languages of images. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Morris, C.W. (1946). Signs, language and behavior Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Natsoulas, T. (1983). What are the objects of perceptual consciousness? American Journal of Psychology 96 (4), 435-67.

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

Nelson, D.L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: appearance, significance, and name. In L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik, eds. Levels of processing in human memory, 45-76. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reed, V.S. & Walling, J.R. (1976). The pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Leaming and Memory 2, 523-28.

Nodine, C.F. & Fisher, D.F., eds. (1979). Perception andpictorial representation. New York: Praeger.

Olson, D.R., ed. (1974). Media and symbols: the forms of expression, communication, and education. 73d yearbook of the National Societyfor the Study ofEducation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Paivio, A. (197 1). Inwgery and verbalprocesses. New York: HoIL

- (1978). A dual coding'approach to perception and cognition. In J. &. H.L. Pick & E. Saltzman, eds. Modes ofperceiving and processing information, 39-5 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

- (1990). Mental representations: a dual coding approach, 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

- (1991). Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology 45, 255-87.

Park, 0. & Hopkins, R. (1993). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: a review. Instructional Science 22, 1-24,

Penrice, L. (1980). The background to perspective. Information Design Journal 1, 190-203.

Perkins, D.N. & Leondar, B., eds. (1977). The arts and cognition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Peterson, M.A. & Hochberg, J. (1983). Opposed-set measurement Procedure: a quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. Joumal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9, 183-93.

Pierce, C.S. (1960). The icon, index, and symbol (1902): collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Pirenne, M.H. (1970). Optics, painting, and photography. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

PYlyshyn, Z.W. (1981). The imagery debate: analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review 88, 16-45.

Readence, J.E. & Moore, D.W. (198 1). A meta-analytic review of the effect of adjunct pictures on reading comprehension. Psychology in the Schools 18, 218-24.

Reed, E. & Jones, R., eds. (1982). Reasonsfor realism: selected essays ofJames J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rieber, L.P. (1989). A review of animation research in computerbased instruction. In Proceedings of selected research papers Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, TX, Feb. 1-5 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 308-832).

Rieber, L.P. (1990). Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 38 (1), 77-86.

- (1994). Computers, graphics, and leaming. Madison, WI: WCB Brown & Benchmark.

Rogers, S. & Costall, A. (1983). On the horizon: picture perception and Gibson's concept of information. Leonardo 16, 180-82. '

Rosenfeld, A. (1986). Human and machine vision 11. New York: Academic.

Roupas, T.G. (1977). Information and pictorial representation. In D. Perkins & B. Leondar, eds. The arts and cognition, 48-79. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press. .

Salomon, G. (1979a). Interaction of media, cognition, and leaming: an exploration of how symbolic forms cultivate mental skills and affect knowledge acquisition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

(1979b). Media and symbol systems as related to cognition and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 71, 131-48.

Samuels, S.J. (1967). Attentional process in reading: the effect of pictures on the acquisition of reading responses. Journal of Educational Psychology 58 (6), 337-42.

- (1970). Effects of pictures on leaming to read, comprehension and attitudes. Review of Educational Research 40, 397-407.

Schallert, D.L. (1980). The role of illustrations in reading comprehension. In B. Spiro & W.F. Brewer, eds. 7heoretical issues in reading comprehension, 503-23. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Scruton, R. (1974). Art and imagination. New York: Harper & Row.

Sebeok, T.A. (1976). Contributions to the doctrine of signs: studies in semiotics, Vol. 5. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Shepard, R.N. (1978). The mental image. American Psychologist 33, 125-37.

Sless, D. (1986). Reading serniotics. Information Design Journa/4,179-89.

Slythe, R.M. (1970). The art of illustration 1750-1900. London: Library Association.

Smith, M.C. & Magee, L.E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109, 373-92.

Spaulding, S. (1955). Research on pictorial illustration. AV Communication Review 3, 35-45.

Tlwyman, M. (1985). Using pictorial language: a discussion of the dimensions of the problem. In T.M.D. & R. Waller, eds. Designing usable texts, 245-312. New York: Academic.

Veltrusky, J. (1976). Some aspects of the pictorial sign. In L. Matejka & I.R. Titunik, eds. Semiotics of art, 245--64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Vitz, P.C. & Glimcher, A.B. (1984). Modem art and modem science. New York: Praeger.

Weber, J.J. (1926). Three important studies on the use of educational films. In A.P. Hollis, ed. Motion pictures for instruction, 162-96. New York: Century.

Wilcox, S. & Edwards, D.A. (1982). Some Gibsonian perspectives on the ways that psychologists use physics. Acta Psychologica 52, 147-63.

Winn, B. (1987). Charts, graphs, and diagrams in educational materials. In D.M. Willows & H.A. Houghton, eds. The psychology of illustration, 152-93. New York: Springer.